Soledad O'Brien: The Diversity Triple Threat of Cable News

Since diversity is now legally mandated in every sector of America life and enforced via hefty discrimination and dispirate impact lawsuites from racial grievance rackets like the SPLC and/or the Justice Department (which have become indistuishable in the last year) every company, its plain to see, has their own token minority employees in legion. You'll notice how rare it is to see black criminals on crime sitcoms and films. For instance from Steve Sailer:

Blacks were 7 times more likely than whites to commit homicide in 2002.

One of my readers recently pointed out that with non-Hispanic whites accounting for only about ten percent of the violent crime in New York City, the three Law & Order television shows were likely to feature more fictional white New York murderers in 2005 than there will be actual white murderers in real life!

Another reader pointed out:

"In the first 24 episodes of Law & Order: Criminal Intent there's only one black murderer, and she is a corrupt police officer. Make of that what you will…"

You'll notice how disportionatly blacks are anchormen and salesmen in the Obama era aswell. The reason that Chase bank and Chilli's all want a black guy selling their product in ad's is to quell potential Jack Jackson's from exhorting them for not having "enough" black employees. When the head of Google recently testified infront of the Senate, Sheila Jackson, the embarssingly ghetto black and proud senator from California used her time to reprsent her constiuents by asking,

"How many black employees does Google have?"

Well, CNN, FOX, MSNBC are all under the same threat of exhortation and to varying degrees work to avoid the R word by clearly having on regular black guests and, in the liberal cable news channels case more ofcourse, having a huge amount of black and hispanic and non-white, non-male anchors and reports. I can only recall 1 or 2 white male anchors at CNN. But more importantly take two constant commentators on FOX and MSNBC: Washington Post black colmunist Eugene Robinson on MSNBC and NPR's Juan Williams on FOX. Both Williams and Robinson hardly have never uttered anything orginal or intresting and are clearly products of affirmtive action for to go by merit cable news on the left and right would be all-white as far as commentators are concerned.

Among the most obvious affirmtive action babys as anchors and reporters are Gwen Iffel and Soledad O'Brien. Soladad is the queen of diversity in media bullshit affirmtive action or should I say diva? She is really hot, and not very bright thats not unique among cable news anchor women but what makes this airhead special is her de facto current position at CNN. Basically, CNN decided that rather than hire 1 black male affirmtive action reporter hire, 1 black female affirmtive action hire, 1 latino male hire, 1 latino female hire they would get multi-racial Soledad to play black and latino at once and make terrible PC documentrarys for CNN called "Black in America" and "Latino in America" (the latter of which didn't even try to hide its pro-amnesty agenda) both which no one in America including blacks and latinos wanted to watch. Soladad apparently had her own show once on CNN but it did so bad they had to delegate her to "making" 2 documentarys a year. Vdare.com's Joe Guzzardi writes brillantly about Soledad below:

O’Brien, who is half Cuban black, half Australian Irish, has gathered many boring conventional awards, including one named after herself: the “Soledad O'Brien Freedom's Voice Award” from the Morehouse School of Medicine for being a “catalyst for social change”.

But, because the competition is stiffer, ours is harder to win—and therefore more prestigious.

I note that the “O’Brien Award” given to O’Brien is significant because, as you will soon learn, she’s in love with herself.

O’Brien has also been included twice in Irish America Magazine’s list of top 100 Irish Americans—as well as on Black Enterprise’s hottest list!

Newsweek featured O’Brien on a cover story and named her as one of the “15 People Who Make America Great”.

Therein lies the secret of O’Brien’s success. No matter what the assignment O’Brien, ethnically speaking, is the right reporter for the job.

When CNN wants a black to interview Michelle Obama, the Hurricane Katrina displaced, or Haiti’s victims, there’s O’Brien posing as a black. (See O’Brien with Obama, her “passion for justice” for New Orleans’ residents displaced by Katrina and the Haitian orphan victims here, here and here. More evidence: in this interview discussing another of her documentaries, “Black in America”, O’Brien identifies herself as black.)

However, if CNN decides that it would be a good idea to run a documentary about being “Latino in America”, they can call on O’Brien, a self described Latina. (Here, among a Hispanic audience, O’Brien reconfirms that description.)

When a highfalutin’ organization needs an ethnically all-purpose speaker, O’Brien is their girl. Her appointment calendar is booked solid because she’s everything all rolled up into one: female, African-American, Hispanic and Irish.

For example, last year on November 10th O’ Brien travelled to Yale University as the guest of the Poynter Fellowship in Journalism to present her speech agonizingly titled “Diversity in the Media: Behind the Scenes & in Our Lives”.

Chances are good that O’Brien used the same notes from her October 28th speech at St. Joseph’s University: “Diversity on TV, Behind the Scenes and in our Lives”.

Or perhaps O’Brien rehashed her January speech given at Duke University, “Black in America: African Americans in the Last Forty Years”. (Watch here.)

Before I launch into why O’Brien won this year, a little biographical information will help you understand why my choice is an easy one.

O’Brien never misses a chance to literally cash in by referring to herself by her complete name, María de la Soledad Teresa O'Brien.

Although she doesn’t speak Spanish, this gives O’Brien an excellent opportunity to define herself as a multicultural maven who’s perfect for CNN or any other mainstream media outlet. Maybe if she looks back far enough in her genealogical tree, she’ll find Asian ancestors!

Against all evidence, O’Brien stretches to make a point of her black/Latina roots. In an interview for her official CNN biography, O’Brien states that she has: “a mass of kinky hair, light brown skin and lots of freckles”.

Photographs of O’Brien do not support her claim. In this ethnically ambiguous photo I see a traditional hairstyle, no freckles and either light brown skin or too much make up.

Now to my topic: During her seven year CNN career and before that at NBC, O’Brien has been consistently terrible on immigration and race.

What iced our award for O’Brien is her two-part documentary, “Latino in America”, which bombed in the ratings and had the curious effect of angering everyone including some Latinos. Her 2007 documentary, “Black in America”, also raised the ire of many blacks.

Defending “Latino in America”, O’Brien tries to make the case that she represents a “voice for the voiceless”.

This position is patently absurd. Anyone who follows immigration knows that immigration reform patriots are the voiceless ones, to the point that the media regularly censors us.

The immigrant story is told repeatedly in the most sympathetic terms on CNN or in the New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, the Washington Post and other major dailies.

What the CNN documentary does, apparently without O’Brien catching the irony, is emphasize why illegal immigration does not—as she would have you believe—make the case for diversity but instead exacerbates the problems of multiculturalism.

One of O’Brien’s subjects is Francisca Abreau, a Dominican high school student apparently in the U.S. illegally, who when pregnant at 14, contemplated suicide. Then, after Abreau gave birth to her anchor baby daughter Destiny (!!!), she received therapy for her continued identity struggles.

Here’s what I take from Abreau’s story: at taxpayer’s expense she took up a seat in a New York classroom, delivered a baby and underwent costly psychological treatments. In the light of my twenty-five years in the California public school system, I would place Francisca’s odds for success as an adult at near zero.

In another segment, O’Brien featured Tucson illegal alien activist Isabel Garcia, who during an open borders rally beheaded a pinata that resembled Sheriff Joe Arpaio. (See it here.) Garcia (email her) defended it as free speech.

One of the interesting things about O’Brien is that for as much time as she spends defining herself as black or Latino, she never refers to herself as American—even though she is American-born, raised in Long Island in comfortable, middle class surroundings.

When O’Brien discussed the conceptual evolution of Latino in America, she said that she was approached by many ethnic groups urging a special on Asian in America, Gay in America, and Muslim in America. But O’Brien never mentioned what would be the most interesting of all: White in America. At least one black viewer agrees.

O’Brien is sharp enough to realize that the multicultural angle works for her. She’s parlayed it into a fat salary and inflated speaking fees. Moreover, she’s married to an investment banker and lives the high life in Manhattan.

Her ethnic roots, whatever they may be, have paid O’Brien rich rewards.

Along with her five siblings, O’Brien is a Harvard graduate. However, she didn’t learn much.

During her recent appearance on Celebrity Jeopardy, she came in last and finished behind basketball legend Kareem Abdul-Jabbar (UCLA).

The final jeopardy question that O’Brien couldn’t answer: “Trees with biblical names include the Joshua tree and the world’s oldest tree, a 4,700-year old pine named for him. What is it?” O’Brien’s reply: “Who is Moses?” (Correct answer: “Who was Methuselah?”)

O’Brien’s excuse: the buzzer is hard to operate.

Along with her complete failure to report honestly about immigration, I deducted points for O’Brien’s smug attitude and grating voice, a big minus for a television anchor. (Watch her talk about Spike Lee here.)

Finally, O’Brien is not only a phony but flat out just not a nice person!

In a non-journalism related incident, last year O’Brien signed an eviction notice for her co-op neighbor because she did not like his dog!

According to O’Brien, a Neapolitan Mastiff in her building offended her because of its "size, slobbering, shedding, drooling, gassiness and odors".

Luckily for Ugo and his owners, the judge threw O’Brien’s case out.

Using Haiti to exsplore the Piggy Bank of the Democratic Party: Poor Brown People

I wonder if the Hiatian goverment has made any overtures to be incorporated into the United States like Puerto Rico?

Ofcourse, Obama would say no, only because it would kill him poltically, though who knows what he would say or do if he could get away with it. In 2060 America when whites are a minority within the United States maybe Haiti will be incorporated as a way for the Democrats (which will be, by then, the de facto latino-black party) to swallow up another couple million democratic votes over night. Thats essentially what the Democratic Party today is begiging to prepare to do in the push for amnesty that the liberals will begin after the health care ordeal subsides.
They want amnesty to, simply, import 20 million illegals over night who will vote entirely for the Democratic Party and will be in the tank for the Democratic Party forever, literally, forever (until around 2060 perhaps when the GOP becomes completly unconservative).

This is gets to an important point about the border. There is not endless time to deal with our broken border. Once latinos become to large a voting block the GOP will lose it's nerve (stupidly because latinos actually don't care about amnesty as much as is assumed) and not run Republicans with patriotic immigration stances. Once the latino population gets to a certain size, if the borders aren't secured they will never be secured or atleast not until latino America decides to do so around the end of this century. Because you see while the latino-black coalition is building its majority over the next decades by birth rates and by importation of blacks and latinos by the millions legally and illegally (through a unenforced border they don't want enforced), they will need an open border to bring in new millions for future amnestys to make them into democrats over night. Once the latino-black coalition achieves a plurality of votes around 2050-2060, they won't nessacrily to keep the border broken to import latino/democrats. But even once the latino-black coalition (which, again, will be the Democratic Party) achieves a racial based majority and whites become a minority group in the US, they might want even more millions of latinos flowing over the border to cement their majority even more.

You must understand that in a few decades time, there will hardly be any difference between racial lines and party lines. They will correspond completly. The percentage of America, latinos and African Americans make up will be near to the exact of the electorate the Democratic Party will capture. So if White Americans (once known as Americans) and asian-Americans compose 40% of the US population, the GOP will receive probably something like 45% of the population.

Thus around 2060, when latinos and blacks make up, say, 64% of the nation's population, they and there party, the Democratic Party will have a de facto lock on the Presidency and on control of the house and senate (the lock being tied by the unbreakable bonds of latino and black ethnic solidarity), they may be able to do alot of stuff they wanted to do: things like tax white rich people more and extend affirmtive action into insane areas and so fourth but they perhaps won't have enough of a majority to do everything like ya know bring mandate that no countys in America be over 90% white or something unimaginable to us because there still the Republicans (aka the whites and asians) who have 40% and can block 2/3rd majority vote of approval. So the Democrats solution will to be to simply grant another amensty to the 20 million new illegal immigrants who have walked into America thanks the open border the Democrats made sure stayed broken.

So they'll pass an amnesty for 30 million illegal immigrants and a year later theres suddenly 27 million new democratic votes cast and now the Democrats have enough to mandate there be no counties that are over 90% white.