The Bastard Son

Do u feel that you've ever seen the real Barack Obama? I don't. He's very much like FDR in this way. He has 2 qualities found in many politicians: he's a bastard child and his political face is a mask. His feeling of being un-wanted seems to have engendered the classic personality of bastard sons: he's in politics cause he wants to be loved (bad reason) which means that he'll say watever it takes to get the most applause no matter how sappy and untrue the statement ("the Afgan, war is a war of nesscity" , "theres no blue state America and red state America"). He'll make policy on pure politics (ala Afganistan) He doesn't want you to know what he thinks and/or wants to do as much as he wants you to think he agrees with you.

However I don't believe Obama will change his major policies according to opinion polls. He will, as I say, temporize and "do what it takes". I along with David Frum find Obama's Afgan policy to be purely political to an extent I personally find sickening. I believe that if Obama where to go by his gut we would be out of Afganistan and Iraq very soon. Though then again i don't think Obama is nearly as intelligent as everyone asserts (though he defintely has a good post-babybommer sense of politics and political timing. I'm not sure he has the rigour of mind to see that it doesn't really matter if we leave tommorow or in two years. However it's really not a suprise that Obama has set a deadline (absurdly) for 18 months in Afganistan. Any President that adopts Iraq and Afganistan is not going to close them up done within his first year as President while he's doing healthcare, the economony, the stimulus, etc. He also seems to be willing to say nearly anything at times. The most appauling examples of Obama cynically lying is a two or three way tie. One egregious example is his first big war on the War in Afganistan where he deemed Afganistan, "a war of aboslute nesscity". He also said to the cadeats at the Anapolis that night that "I would never send you into harms way if I did not absolutely have to". Well that second statement is a lie and I would like to think that Obama woldn't have the ignorance to write either line that i quote above. Like so many Obama statements in his speeches, the assertions that get lauded and never challendged don't stand up upon inspection.

Putting "Country First"?

This point comes approximately 1 year or 2 too late but who cares:

You shall remember that during the dreadful campaign of 2008, the lackluster Republican Nominee, John McCain's campiagn slogan was "Country First" below a military-esque star logo.



Over time the hypocritical absurdity and audacity of McCain making "Country First" his official campiagn slogan has only become more and more apparent. It's no mystery why he choose "Country First" because McCain wanted to play up the only issue his pollsters said he did well next to Obama on: national security.

"Country First" doesn't imply as much as says and promises and proclaims, at once, that John McCain is the kind of Presidential candiate who would never put his campaign ahead of his, ya' know......country.

The kind of politician that puts "Country First" is the kind candiate who wouldn't back a policy that was bad for the country just because they think it will, say, help them win a descive amount of votes among a certain voting bloc in the Arizona, er, i mean, nation's electorate. Like those white male Republican politicians from states with large latino populations like George W. Bush who back amnesty, a policy that is terrible for America in every way, because there political guru's tell them that if they do they can gain a extra slice of the latino vote that will prove descive in the upcoming election, kinda right? This reminds me, why did John McCain go to that Hispanic Caucus luncheon immediatly following the his defeat to Barak Obama and have a breakdown grabbing the microphone to accuse latinos of "betraying" him after all the "sacrifices" he made for them. What could McCain have meant by "sacrifices"? I mean, what did he do for hispanics that sacrificied his popularity with other (more patriotic-minded)? It's a real mystery.

And ya' know, John McCain was really putting politics second and "Country First" when he picked Sara Palin to be his running mate. Because, McCain decided to put stretagic political consideration to the side and just pick the most qualfied person in America for the job of VP when he choose Palin.
Sure, McCain could've picked some airhead who Republican pollsters and campiagn gurus like Karl Rove thought would poll we and help him out with a certain segment of the populations like women or hispanics but when it came time to pick a VP nominee John said,

"I do not care, do you understand me?, I repeat, I do not care if it's not good for our campaign I've got to pick the most qualified person for the job of Vice President, someone who knows the most about the world, whose read the great philosphers and historians, whose shown a profound understanding of the issues for years, some one with not just a brillant mind, there are lots of those, but the most brillant mind, someone who doesn't just know who Martin Van Buren's Secretary of State was but knows his whole biography let alone his name and thats why I've decided to pick Sarah Palin. I know that you guys are going to say that, 'she's too cerebreal! She's too intellectual! She'll never connect, let alone, relate with the common man!' or tell me that 'She's another Adlai Stevenson!'. But, look, I'll say it one time only: Sara Palin may not be the most attractive person that we could've picked, sure she doesn't exactly have sex appeal and sure she's a little plump and sure, theres more than a few wrinkles on her brow but shes got the most brillant mind of any politician in the United States. She may not prove to be the best for me poltically, but she's the best qualified for Vice President, for 2nd in command and I'm pointing country first!...For if, god forbid, I pass while in the White House, my friends, I want to know, I want to go to bed at night knowing, that I will have left for my beloved nations sake, not some airhead Republican who looks good but who hasn't a clue who Edmund Burke is but rather the most capable and equipt and eurdite American (available to me right now) in my place, as commander and chief of the United States of America. Lets face it my friends, I am well into my 7th decade and I still have cancer that at the moment lies dormant but at any time can return and put me 6 feet deep, when I picked VP, unlike Obama, I could very well be picking my succescor as President and thus I have a duty to place politics to the side and pick Sara Palin."

More lies & All you need to know about Eric Holder's Justice Department

Worshipers at the altar of Obama, a poltician who would never lie to them, so they thought so credulously.

1.

Remember how those starry eyed youngsters gathered in Grant Park on election night last Novemember as Obama was elected and walked out on stage to address the nation? Well they were starry eyed mostly cause they were stoned (i know i saw them before they left on the El) but anyways those kids really believed Obama, despite his whole career in the Chicago Machine (and the whole biography of his they knew nothing about) that he was not a real politician. They thought he was Mr.Change, Mr. Reform, a guy who could never lie or double deal to get elected. Well, they still think for the same reason they thought that then. Why? Cause they didn't know anything about Obama then and they still don't today. That part of the nation gets roughly 1/10 the news of the day. Since there news outlets, NPR, ABC, and the like have gone on hiatus for the Obama adminstration and become PR firms working for the Whitehouse.

2.

They don't know for instance that Obama lied to them, time and time again, when he promised that the health care negoaitations would be televised on Cspan and that there would be no secret behind-closed-doors meetings, so that we can "whose working for the pharmecutical companys and whose working for the people" he said.
Well come a few ago, CSPAN said "We're Waiting?.........." to no avail. Obama simply lied. But did NPR tell you? Did MSNBC? How about Keith Oblermann? No, they where to busy talking about what Pat Robertson said about why the Hiatian Earthquake occured and distorting what, there favriote boogey-man, Rush Limbaugh said.
3.

And here's another story that shows how transparent and open to the public the Obama Adminstration is being: remember that polling station in Philadephia that the Black Panthers took over in full military regalia with weapons such as night sticks, intimidating and yelling racial slurs at whites trying to vote, telling one white guy, "Your about to be ruled by the black man, cracker!"? Well, the Bush adminstration justice department had begun the prosectution of the black panthers involved but couldn't finish the prosecution before the Obama adminstration came in last Januarary. And guess what? Eric Holder, decided to hault and end the entire case against the Black Panthers. This is while Holder sues Georgia for the "crime" of reuiring that those who want to vote verify citizenship with a ID. This is "discrimatory" according to Obama's Justice Department. Are blacks not allowed to get ID's in Georgia? No, they can like anyone else, but Holder claims that requiring voters to prove citizenship (a pretty basic procedure i thought) "disportionately effects African Americans and Latinos". So its illegal for Georgia require ID to vote because Holder claims blacks will not bring ID more than whites? huh? What if whites where effected more than blacks by Georgia's ID requirment? Would Holder sue Georgia then for "discrimination"? I don't think so. The truth is that Holder simply wants to ensure a high black turn out and illegal immigrant turn out so that he can keep his office in the Justice Department another term. But lets review, according to Barak Obama and the head of the Department of Justice, Eric Holder: its ok for a gang of black panthers to forcibly take over a Philadephia polling booth with weapons, to intimidate voters, yell racial slurs at white voters, but its "illegal" for the state of Georgia to have any requirments to make sure non-citizens are voting by requiring those who want to vote to prove citizenship. And i wonder would Holder have prosecuted that Philadephia case if the KKK had forcibly taken hold of a Philadephia voting station and intimidated and yell racial slurs at black voters? Something tells me Holder not only would have prosecuted that case but that we would still be hearing about for 20 years on NPR, ABC, MSNBC, with 5 year commerations of what happened. Justice indeed, huh?
Anyway, it gets even worse, even more hyprocritical and ridiclous. So after Holder squashed the case against the black panthers, some Republicans in the Senate where honorable enough to demand a exsplanation on behalh of the Justice Department for why they stopped the prosecution. But the Obama Justice Department refused to exsplain why it squashed the case, defying precedent even the Bush adminstation had never flouted.

The Black Panthers, night sticks in hand afront the Philadephia voting station, threatening a person taking a picture of there take over of the voting precinict.

Too bad only the readers of the Drudge Report, National Review, Vdare.com and a few other sites even know about these outrages. When will the mainstream media awake from its honeymoon with the Obama Adminstration (literally cause they are marrying each other) and start to be journalists again? Or is Rachel Maddow just going to spend each day calling Tea Partyers racists in a different sly way?

The young potheads that elected Barak Obama have no idea what there guy has been doing in office, they don't give a damn, there doing kegstands right now. And yet they are always getting appluaded by the Maureen Dowds. Yet the older patriotic Americans who care and know enough about whats going on to actually partcipate in Democracy by protesting and going to town-halls and speeches and rallys, they get scorned by the Mainstream Media, Maureen Dowd villifys them because there not "diverse" enough, because she doesn't like there skin color and there age.

Reform. Change. Transperency. Bah Humbug.

Californian Warning: The Perils of Diversity in Democracies

The fact that California is falling apart at the seems and so deep in debt that its now pleading for a federal bailout, should be taken as a warning of the perils of allowing our southern border to be over run by millions of Mexicans who, our own goverment goes out of it's way to give free welfare money to (not to mention free education, scholarships, health care & public services). Its not just perilous to our debt and to bankrupted hospitals but to our very democracy. Democracy cannot work if a large chunk of it's participants hold allegiances to another country entirely. The electrate at the mininum has to share some general intrest in the prosperity of America as opposed to, say, Peru or Somalia. For instance, in California everyone knows the obvious solution to the debt crisis, namely stop giving illegal immigrants trillions of tax payer money. Why don't they do it? Why does Arnold Schwarzenegger (the Micheal Bloomberg of California), pretend and the whole state assembly pretend they cant save any money or make any more cuts? Because California is now over half latino & to tell the truth is poltical sucide because half the population are Mexicans who could give a damn about America's debt as long as they and there illegal immigrant brothers and sisters get there spoils.

It's obvious latinos, as a whole, are competly indifferent to the plight of non-latino Americans. They look out for there own. Are you to tell me the reason LA RAZA is the only group advocating for exsplicit non-emergency free goverment funding health care for 20 million illegals is because they think that it would be bad for America if 20 million illegals couldn't get free surgerys and aderall presciptions on the tab of the American tax payer? No, the reason latino groups are always the ones standing up to protest efforts to enforce our immigration laws, to use e-verify to make sure illegals aren't taking Americans jobs, is that latino groups and latino polticians are looking out for latinos not Americans. How will amnesty for 20 million illegal immigrants at a time when almost 20 million Americans are unemployed be good for America? I have yet to get one liberal to answer that question. But i can tell you how amnesty for 20 million illegal immigrants will be good for 20 million illegal immigrants. That's easy.


This is all fucking obvious, any honest, rational person can see the truth about LA RAZA and latino-Americans, in general. There not bad people, there not inferiour. No, there simply disloyal to America. If you need even more evidence of what is right before our eyes, then i direct you to the slew of polls and studies that all show the same disloyality of Mexican-Americans time and time again. Ofcourse, i should make something of a exception for Cubans.

And the fact that we can't call it like it is, the fact that we cannot say what has been shown to be true about Mexican immigrants will be the downfall of this nation. In effect, the poltically correct police will not allow any person of promience to even identify the threat of immigration. We are not allowed to even warn the public of the consquences of open borders and mass immigration and inturn ofcourse the public will not pay attention.

A historic moment lost upon us all?

I'm not the first to suggest this but just a few months ago did the first lesbian join the Supreme Court without the media saying a word about it?

Sotomayor sure looks the part but ofcourse delving into her rather murky sexual life would have only hurt Judge Sotomayor's chances thus the media seems to have not researched the matter at all.

She divorced and never remarried and their doesn't seem to be any evidence of Sotomayor batting for both teams at present and i cannot attest to the contrary but i'd guess she's, at the very least, not all that intrested in men but then again and i wouldn't be so suprised if a former girlfriend did surfaced in the media. But then again, wouldn't any former lover just be doing harm to the Lesbian-Gay-Bisexual-Transgender communities agenda by outing herself? And not to be nasty, who would really want to be known as a former conquest of Judge Sonya Sotomayor (pictured above)?

Not that her sexual orientation matters to me. Her ruling in Ricci v. DeStefano, her membership to LA RAZA is what scares me.

Oddly enough researching Sotomayor's sexual orienation`, i came across this funny throwaway line from a lesbian site called lezgetreal.com on this very subject:

"Judge Sotomayor may be a lesbian, but even that should not disqualify her from sitting on the bench. All indications are that Sotomayor is only an activist judge if you squint really hard and take the line that an activist judge is someone who follows the laws as they are written. Indeed, one study published back when Bush II was in office found that most of the activist judges, that is a judge who ignores the law and inserts their own opinions into a case, were Conservatives and not Liberals."

Which makes me wonder: do liberals really believe themselves when they spout such obvious nonsence?