Millions of westerners today claim that we know 1. how hot it will be in a century, how much climates will change and how much of that change will be natural and how much will be caused by man. They claim that there is no debate about these questions (even though they are almost impossible to answer) and claim that all the exsperts agree (also untrue). However in another hugely important era of demographics unlike climatolgy we can actually predict what the future will look like. We know that Russia will be majority muslim in 2050 and that France and the Netherlands will also go majority muslims in this century also. Furthermore, we know that our own nation, America, will no longer have a white/European majority in around 2050.
All those who don't care abobut truth and merely want to be PC should stop reading now. The truth is that we have a grim future ahead of us to avoid that unlike the climate scare is completly real and obvious. Their are no nations on earth with muslim majjorities which are also free. So if France becoming muslim is not good. We will slowly lose our European allies as they become muslim.
And why shouldn't we avoid a latino majority coming about in America also since latinos commit more crime, do worse at school, are more racist than, etctera ectera compared to whites? (and a latino-black majority would impose socialism aswell.)
so instead of reducing immigration we kill our economny with useless carbon taxes. decline, oh sweet decline.
Showing posts with label "global warming". Show all posts
Showing posts with label "global warming". Show all posts
Wednesday, March 3, 2010
Monday, February 1, 2010
Obama's is placing America down the European path as the European abandon that route for a more (pre-Obama) US Route relizing bankruptcy of nannystat
Have you noticed anything missing from the health care "debate"? Any words, in paticular the utter absensce of which has become rather striking by now?
Have you eyed or eared the following word lately: Europe? No? Well me neither which is only yet another inditment of the quality of the healthcare tug of war which is currently on hiatus while Obama tries to shepered the passing of a "Jobs Bill" they very sound of which makes me reach for my wallet and my revolver.
One would think, if rationality where the animating force of the health care scuffle, there would have been tremendous debate about whether European style socialist health care and the European welfare state was such a smahing success.
My intuitive media radar tells me that, amazingly, no one has yet to point out the Democrats are trying to drag a unwilling America onto a path that the more socialistic west Europeans democracies went down decades ago and yetto go by what can roughly be called the on going healthcare debate you would think that that the Democrats want to do something entirely orginal that has never been tried before by nation(s). It seems strangely that it's the Democrats who don't want to talk about Europe and how all the policy they yearn for worked out in the long run in the nations who adopted these basic policies long ago. Right now, figuring out whether the story of goverment run health care was a triumph or a tragedy (or a tragedy waiting to happen) is clearly the most important question to answer in the short term. But the other items on the Obama agenda after healthcare have also been in Europe sometimes not so long ago really at all. Take, Cap & Trade, one of the worst items on the Obama wishlist and a issue unlike obamacare is easy to understand and easy to predict in all the terrible economic effects Cap & Trade will have and all the "transformative" enviomental effects it won't have as a result of reducing carbon emissions a neglible amount easily nullfied by all the co2 the devloping world emits. The only thing that Cap and trade will be help to cut back on is jobs and business in America, the neglible amount of Co2 we cut back will have no effect on the climate. No one serious denies that Cap & Traade is bad for Americans economically. Combined with the increased burdens plcaed on buisness big and small the increased cost of doing business here created by Cap & Trade will send business and corporations moving out of the country for good and taking their jobs with them as well as rapidly bring about a massive wave of outsourcing of jobs to Asian economies whichhave become far more buusiness friendly than the United States. The Democrats don't realize that America has to actually compete in this world to keep and to imaintain and increase the appeal of the American economny. Businessmen, investors, and people in today realize or atleast think that the United States is about to move to the left, Obama may loose in 2012 but the feeling is that he will invetiably be able to put in place huge liberal structural changes that will have the goverment running American healthcare among other changes, following the European model that has proved sucidial if not simply diastrous for Europe economically as well as socially stymmying entrupernership, indpdence and indutrury on the oart of the indivual and mking citizens into the children of the stat and, meanwhile, as America appears adamant upon followiwng Europe's exact footsteps of decline, the Asiatic nations of India, China, Singapore and the like appear to have learned in a deep way all the lessons that America has forgotten for the moment, about limited goverment, taxes and beyond.
Americans seem to be blind to the fact that they can no longe exspect for business to turn the other check again and againand not move its jobs out of America if the Democrats levy the burdens of obamacare on business, then increase the cost of doing business in America even more (and raise energy prices) ship away even more jobs with Cap & Trade those sacrficies would allresult in the cutting back of a negligible, insignifgant amount of co2-as the most honest green people will admit like Ralph Nader. So Cap & Trdae will, in summary, ship away millions of jobs , dramaticly increase the cost of doing business in America,raising food and energy prices and imposing the largest ever tax aka transfer of wealth from the people to the Goverment in our history and all these sacrficies will be for what "pay off"? "Green jobs" won't make up dir anything like the huge amount of jobs lost to asia as a result o this. But won't we save the earth? No, because Cap & Trade will have no apparent climatological benefit s for the very reason that theactual cut backs in Co2 will be neglibible and completly nullfied, canceled out and over come by the amount of the Co2 China and/or India alone will increasingly emit. Once you make it clear that there is no climatelogical signifgance the hapless true believers of Cap & Trade tell you that its good for the economy to deveolp "green technologies" the fact is that no one wants to 3 times as much money for clean solar energy shen you can get clean nuclear energy without the higher prices with nuclear power plants which don't emit Co2. One lesson that should be taken from France is that if America got as much of its energy from nuclear as France did, we would be well below the traget emissions reductions and unlike with solar and wind energy it wouldn't exact a completly unviable economic cost. The fact is that"green" technologies aren't good enough yet and that if we were smart we would invest in further research that could create better green techbologies. In short, Obama's talk of "green jobs" as the new base of the glorious new American ecoconomy is something only Ralph Nader could come up with. But then again China and India are making it clear they won't sign on to any global govermental climate change agency or treaty unless they receive payments in the billions from America as Obama has just done for Africa giving them a 100 billion dollars we don't have for corrupt African regimes to "prepare forclimate change". Coopenheganshould have been the definitive turning point for americans who realized that the whole summit was basically a 3rd world scheme to force America to essentially create a binding international govermental body that will allow Africa and some other 3rd world nations to vote themselves 100 of billions of Americantax payer dollars without consolntanting the American people , without Americans having any kind of veto. Essentially, if America wants to try new, alternative sources of energy it should build its self more nuclear power plants and force the Nevaians not to reneg on there contract and allow Yukka Mountain to be used as a place to store nuclear waste. Getting more of our energy from nuclear power will unlike unvialable solar and wind energy won't double the amount of money Americans pay for energy. Since no one but a minature elite with money to waste will buy into hugely exspensive solar & wind energy if they free market is allowed to decide it would way Obama will be able to deliver even a small portion any of the 2 million green jobs (which Obama, in speeches and in TV ad's has poytrayed as the new base of the US economny itself over more billionr Only if the goverment tyranically forces Americans and American companies into buying overly exspensive "green" energy with crackpot schemes like Cap & Trade.
This generation of Americans hasexspects continued prosperity to continue automatic as the divine state of American economomc and more problematicly many Americans, again on the left,have trouble accepting truths that aren't what they'd like them to be. This is true of Global WArming, race, diversity, immigration, education, latinos, latino assmilation, patriotism and IQ. But at the moment the first a nd most important bubble belief to popped is the multi-faceted global warming myth(s) that include 1. Al Gore's "science" is shaky at best and is all best on computer projection modeling, much of the data has been shown to be manupilated and less credible than before thought Thomas Friedman doesn't know how hot it will be in 87 years and at what rate it will get hot 2.No one has shown for sure how much climate changecurrently is effected by man made activetly versus the natural climate cycle 3. CHina and India and Russia and much if not all of the devolpoing world is totally opposed to the global goverment treay/entity that would hava to be created in order to enforce a serious climate change treaty, even if China and India did join in and allow intrusive inspection and not enough co@, according to Al GOre 's sources, would be cut (let alone in time) to have any real effect. In other words it can't be done now, unless some new method of cleaning the climate, like cloudwashing and that type of stuff that could to alot more for alot less money compared to economony killing stuff like Cap & Trade.
that will lead to the shipping away of millions of jobs to more attractive and in a way more stable Asian markets long & short term effects the which is easy to understand not endlessly complex, issue that issue whicv
and the success and failure and sustsenability of French and other european' countries health care
Have you eyed or eared the following word lately: Europe? No? Well me neither which is only yet another inditment of the quality of the healthcare tug of war which is currently on hiatus while Obama tries to shepered the passing of a "Jobs Bill" they very sound of which makes me reach for my wallet and my revolver.
One would think, if rationality where the animating force of the health care scuffle, there would have been tremendous debate about whether European style socialist health care and the European welfare state was such a smahing success.
My intuitive media radar tells me that, amazingly, no one has yet to point out the Democrats are trying to drag a unwilling America onto a path that the more socialistic west Europeans democracies went down decades ago and yetto go by what can roughly be called the on going healthcare debate you would think that that the Democrats want to do something entirely orginal that has never been tried before by nation(s). It seems strangely that it's the Democrats who don't want to talk about Europe and how all the policy they yearn for worked out in the long run in the nations who adopted these basic policies long ago. Right now, figuring out whether the story of goverment run health care was a triumph or a tragedy (or a tragedy waiting to happen) is clearly the most important question to answer in the short term. But the other items on the Obama agenda after healthcare have also been in Europe sometimes not so long ago really at all. Take, Cap & Trade, one of the worst items on the Obama wishlist and a issue unlike obamacare is easy to understand and easy to predict in all the terrible economic effects Cap & Trade will have and all the "transformative" enviomental effects it won't have as a result of reducing carbon emissions a neglible amount easily nullfied by all the co2 the devloping world emits. The only thing that Cap and trade will be help to cut back on is jobs and business in America, the neglible amount of Co2 we cut back will have no effect on the climate. No one serious denies that Cap & Traade is bad for Americans economically. Combined with the increased burdens plcaed on buisness big and small the increased cost of doing business here created by Cap & Trade will send business and corporations moving out of the country for good and taking their jobs with them as well as rapidly bring about a massive wave of outsourcing of jobs to Asian economies whichhave become far more buusiness friendly than the United States. The Democrats don't realize that America has to actually compete in this world to keep and to imaintain and increase the appeal of the American economny. Businessmen, investors, and people in today realize or atleast think that the United States is about to move to the left, Obama may loose in 2012 but the feeling is that he will invetiably be able to put in place huge liberal structural changes that will have the goverment running American healthcare among other changes, following the European model that has proved sucidial if not simply diastrous for Europe economically as well as socially stymmying entrupernership, indpdence and indutrury on the oart of the indivual and mking citizens into the children of the stat and, meanwhile, as America appears adamant upon followiwng Europe's exact footsteps of decline, the Asiatic nations of India, China, Singapore and the like appear to have learned in a deep way all the lessons that America has forgotten for the moment, about limited goverment, taxes and beyond.
Americans seem to be blind to the fact that they can no longe exspect for business to turn the other check again and againand not move its jobs out of America if the Democrats levy the burdens of obamacare on business, then increase the cost of doing business in America even more (and raise energy prices) ship away even more jobs with Cap & Trade those sacrficies would allresult in the cutting back of a negligible, insignifgant amount of co2-as the most honest green people will admit like Ralph Nader. So Cap & Trdae will, in summary, ship away millions of jobs , dramaticly increase the cost of doing business in America,raising food and energy prices and imposing the largest ever tax aka transfer of wealth from the people to the Goverment in our history and all these sacrficies will be for what "pay off"? "Green jobs" won't make up dir anything like the huge amount of jobs lost to asia as a result o this. But won't we save the earth? No, because Cap & Trade will have no apparent climatological benefit s for the very reason that theactual cut backs in Co2 will be neglibible and completly nullfied, canceled out and over come by the amount of the Co2 China and/or India alone will increasingly emit. Once you make it clear that there is no climatelogical signifgance the hapless true believers of Cap & Trade tell you that its good for the economy to deveolp "green technologies" the fact is that no one wants to 3 times as much money for clean solar energy shen you can get clean nuclear energy without the higher prices with nuclear power plants which don't emit Co2. One lesson that should be taken from France is that if America got as much of its energy from nuclear as France did, we would be well below the traget emissions reductions and unlike with solar and wind energy it wouldn't exact a completly unviable economic cost. The fact is that"green" technologies aren't good enough yet and that if we were smart we would invest in further research that could create better green techbologies. In short, Obama's talk of "green jobs" as the new base of the glorious new American ecoconomy is something only Ralph Nader could come up with. But then again China and India are making it clear they won't sign on to any global govermental climate change agency or treaty unless they receive payments in the billions from America as Obama has just done for Africa giving them a 100 billion dollars we don't have for corrupt African regimes to "prepare forclimate change". Coopenheganshould have been the definitive turning point for americans who realized that the whole summit was basically a 3rd world scheme to force America to essentially create a binding international govermental body that will allow Africa and some other 3rd world nations to vote themselves 100 of billions of Americantax payer dollars without consolntanting the American people , without Americans having any kind of veto. Essentially, if America wants to try new, alternative sources of energy it should build its self more nuclear power plants and force the Nevaians not to reneg on there contract and allow Yukka Mountain to be used as a place to store nuclear waste. Getting more of our energy from nuclear power will unlike unvialable solar and wind energy won't double the amount of money Americans pay for energy. Since no one but a minature elite with money to waste will buy into hugely exspensive solar & wind energy if they free market is allowed to decide it would way Obama will be able to deliver even a small portion any of the 2 million green jobs (which Obama, in speeches and in TV ad's has poytrayed as the new base of the US economny itself over more billionr Only if the goverment tyranically forces Americans and American companies into buying overly exspensive "green" energy with crackpot schemes like Cap & Trade.
This generation of Americans hasexspects continued prosperity to continue automatic as the divine state of American economomc and more problematicly many Americans, again on the left,have trouble accepting truths that aren't what they'd like them to be. This is true of Global WArming, race, diversity, immigration, education, latinos, latino assmilation, patriotism and IQ. But at the moment the first a nd most important bubble belief to popped is the multi-faceted global warming myth(s) that include 1. Al Gore's "science" is shaky at best and is all best on computer projection modeling, much of the data has been shown to be manupilated and less credible than before thought Thomas Friedman doesn't know how hot it will be in 87 years and at what rate it will get hot 2.No one has shown for sure how much climate changecurrently is effected by man made activetly versus the natural climate cycle 3. CHina and India and Russia and much if not all of the devolpoing world is totally opposed to the global goverment treay/entity that would hava to be created in order to enforce a serious climate change treaty, even if China and India did join in and allow intrusive inspection and not enough co@, according to Al GOre 's sources, would be cut (let alone in time) to have any real effect. In other words it can't be done now, unless some new method of cleaning the climate, like cloudwashing and that type of stuff that could to alot more for alot less money compared to economony killing stuff like Cap & Trade.
that will lead to the shipping away of millions of jobs to more attractive and in a way more stable Asian markets long & short term effects the which is easy to understand not endlessly complex, issue that issue whicv
and the success and failure and sustsenability of French and other european' countries health care
Sunday, January 31, 2010
All You Need To About Global Warming Profiteers
Al Gore's flock claim, with their usually uncanny certitude (e.g. "It will be this cold in 200 years!") that we only have about 10-15 YEARS till its too late to avert "diaster" (by the way:in 20 yrs. they'll be saying we have "10 years left") If they were not lying they would be THE BIGGEST FANS OF NUCLEAR POWER IN THE WORLD b/c they'd realize 1.There's no chance of switching EVEN 30% OF THE US ECONOMY (which would do nothing if u could) to solar & etc.because Americans wont pay 3 times more for energy but they will switch to non poulluting nuclear power which is very cheap. So the alarmists if they belived their b.s. would comprmise to save the "earth".
Friday, January 15, 2010
Media Bias & the Hiatian Earthquake
The companion news-story to the Haitian earthquake has been"The 700 Club" host Pat Robertson's claim that the Hiatian earthquake was brought about by the "deal they made with the devil" in order to beat the French and gain indepdence in the 19th century through a ferecious slave rebellion-the first sussecful slavery revoultion which hurt the French pocket book so badly that it led Napepolian to sell the Louissana Territory to America during Jefferson's Adminstration.
Apparently the liberal media is also, as always, making a big hoo-haw about something, there favaroite villian, Rush Limabaugh said about Obama's relief effort in Haiti which i don't know and don't really care to know (i know it will be ridiclously distorted by the wretched Wanda Sykes' of the media).
Anyways, Pat Robertson's remarks are odd, he must refering to something could he really be speaking extemprnously when he says that. But i'm sorry to say i'm not outraged like all those who are pretending to be.
But get this: a liberal celebrity said something similiary absurd about the great quake. His name is Danny Glover. Remember him? Yeah, i used to like him to. His voice has changed radically since I've last seen him in a film. I recall him once sounding sophisticated and old school, like a gruff black barber circa 1943. Remember how he spoke in "The Royal Tennabaums" when Wes Anderson put him ina bow tie & a blue suite and made him talk jive with Gene Hackman? Well its shocking to here him now, he sounds like a generic black guy having drunk to much whiskey. In a interview after this Hiatian quake he said that the earthquake was the result of the failure of the Coopenhegan Climate summit according to Glover (who i recently discovered to be a crazy radical leftists, when i saw him in the film version of Howard Zinn's definitive anti-american, PC, history of the United States alongside Matt Damon, Alice Walker (the 2nd rate Toni Morison), and other such creatures.
I must say that both Glover and Robertson's remarks on the earthquake are ludicrous but if one has to choose Glover's exsplanation is the more absurd in my mind. I mean, he surely is saying that if only Obama had given away not a 100 billion to corrupt Africa but 200 billion of our tax dollars the teutonic plates below the Caribbean would reconsider moving in such a tumtulous fashion.
But Danny Glover's idiocy has gone virtually unreported by the Mainstream Media. With Robertson the liberal media can do a favariote hobby of theres and bash white Christians. If they covered Glover's remark (which is more signfigant because Glover's comments are not unique but common in the aftermath of natural diaster like this earthquake occurs.
And by the way: aren't there hundreds of Hiatian and other 3rd world/African reverends who have been known to constantly make statements just like Pat Robertson's? I'm sure Hiatian priests and preachers who will blame this blight upon them on sin. And don't they do child sacrifice in Haiti? just like in the Congo and most of Africa? Or something barbaric like female gentaila mutatilation? or cermonial rape? Surely these practices, which are far more backward and "outragous" than anything that has come from Pat Robertson's mouth, are more worthy of exsposure and being condemned? But ofcourse, white liberals see African culture are sublime and superior to our own so they just rag on poor old Pat Robertson while, these do-gooders say not a word about the barbarism that occurs everyday in Africa and 3rd world slum nations like Haiti.
Sunday, January 3, 2010
The appauling arrogance of the left's global warming assertions
This is how the left talks about climate change. (Pay paticular attention to the condescion of Bob Shrum)
I rarely feel like straggling the person i disagree with. Only when the liberal pulls out the condescending grin do i get the urge bludgeon there arrogant faces to they look like a egg yoke and hamburger helper. Surely, you know the look? It is the classic liberal poise: ya know, the snob skoffing at your "ridiclous", "laughable", suggestion that there could be any debate about climate change. They oscillate between yelling "There is no debate about the facts of global warming!" and "No serious scientists disagree!" and grinning like jackasses on happy gas.
You can see exactly what i mean in the link above.
They laugh at any suggestion that "the debate is over". Then Prince Charles gets up on the rostrum in Coopnhegan and says "We have 7 years until" we lose all hope of averting diaster. And what i presume the "debate is over" about that too? Once you say "the debate is over about climate change", "all serious scientists agree" i guess if you fool people that far then you can just say whatever you want.
I would call these people hucksters because they are using climate change and false claims about it to steal people's money and gain control of the economy but they- Al Gore, Obama-don't even seem to realize that there being fooled by the African delegate hucksters demanding money out of there "deep concern about climate change" (sure Robert Mugabe).
Here's my question for Al Gore and his cru of power hungry liars:
You say the debate is over. Well i assume you've thus long ago answered the following questions, can you let me in on the answers to them and your proof of why your answers are "undebateable":
1. How much will the sea rise in the next 60 years? How much hotter will it be? How bout' in 200 years? How fast will the climate change? What effect will it have on America, etc? Show me how you know this for a fact.
2. How much of this change is caused by man-made activity and/or Co2 and how much of this change is part of the natural climate cycle (since the climate is always changing and always has been well before humans evolved)? How much climate change is the result of changes in sun spots, the ozone layer and other non-man-made factors? Show me how you know this.
3. Can this climate change be stopped? What will it take? How do you know?
4. Are the cutbacks needed to slow or stop climate viable?
5. Will America and a few EU nations making slight cutbacks in Co2 make any difference when China and India are emitting more than we save?
These are the 5 questions which have to be answered in order to act intelligently on climate change (if it is as Gore's prediction claim). Yet none of them have at all been answered. Yet Gore says "the debate is over" about them.
To say the "debate is over" is such a amazingly arrogant statement because these above questions are almost impossibly difficult to answer and his statements like Obama and all the other alarmists statements say that these questions are easy have long ago been answered and there is no debate about what the answer is. Who can say that there is no debate about how hot it will be in a century? no debate about how much cutbacks will have to be made to have a effect?
The fact Al Gore doesn't want people to know is that human activity accounts for 2% percent of Co2 emitted. Animals emit more carbon into the atomsphere than cars by a factor of over 20.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)