Showing posts with label Eric Holder. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Eric Holder. Show all posts

Monday, January 18, 2010

Endless Dualities

Ever since the Obama era began i've been seeing doubles. Here's what I mean.

FIRST DUALITY
1. How does Obama treat mass murderer, KSM, the mastermind of 9-11

Obama acting against all precedents decides that Khalid Sheik Muhhomad (aka KSM) has Constuinial right even though he is not a citizen of the United States, leaving the side that he is the murderer of 3,000+ people, as the mastermind, the (confessed) mastermind, of 9/11. KSM admitted to what we know he did and pleaded to be executed.......like 5 years ago! And now, Obama and Eric Holder have decided to bring KSM to New York City for a civil civilian trial! not a military court!
Obama, showing such regard for our deficit, is bringing KSM to New York knowing that security alone for the trial will cost the US tax payer 200 million dollars, plus other innumerable costs. This means that KSM will be given millionaire liberal treasonist lawyers likely from ACLU to defend him and the litigation of the trial will extend, many legal anyalsts guess, a minumum of six years. In that time, the nation will watch ACLU treastonist lawyers argue (with the aid of all the former ACLU & SPLC & CAIR lawyers within Obama's new Justice Department) that all the evidence and confessions against KSM that where (even possibly) extracted by methods of "toture" (aka making KSM listen to Van Halen all day) must wiped from the record and rendered nhill. So, chances are, a good or great deal of the CIA's evidence against KSM will be rendered void. Who knows but i can't believe KSM won't be given the death penality. The embarsment will be that it will take 6 or 7 years and that at the end it will have cost the American people hundreds of millions of dollars when we should have hung KSM long ago. Obama will also make America look like a joke to extremists who will watch as pony-tailed CAIR & ACLU lawyers (who will probably be jews to blind to see that there client, KSM, would stab them in the heart with a ball point pen if he could) argue for there man, KSM on TV for 6 years! They'll watch as weak methods of forced interrogation will condemned and they will laugh at how weak and femnized America has become. 50,000 New Yorkers have signed a peition

2. How does Obama treat a American army solidier in Iraq

A navy seal accused of punching a Iraqi terrorist will be put on trial in Iraq, in a secret military tribunal so that we won't know what punishment he gets. So KSM, a non-citizen and a mass murderer who admitted to mastermining 9-11 and says he wants to die, gets full civil rights enshrined for citizens, a 6 year trial with millionaire dollar NYC lawyers but a Navy Seal who is accused of punching a terrorist in Iraq, doesn't get a civilian trial but a secret miltary tribunal that was made for people like KSM to be sentenced in secret.


DUALITY 2

1. Major Nadal Hasan jumps on a table at Fort Hood shouts "Alakuabar!" some islamic jihadist phrase and procedds to unload bullets, killing 16 off duty soldiers. We fine out that in power points as a pschritist he wrote about his love of jihad. His co-workers had reported years before his attachment to jihadism. We find out that the islamic phrase on his business card translated as "Warrior of Jihad". We find his emails back and fourth planning with a radical terrorist Imam in Yemen who later turns out to have helped trained the Nigerian crotch bomber. (there's even more information too). And Barak Obama comes on TV after the Hasan shooting and assures the country that the Fort Hood shooting had nothing to with Islam. Defense Secertary, Robert Gates, asked if he considered the Fort Hood Masscre a islamic terrorist attack, responds "im not even going to go there".

2. The New Haven Fire Deptarment gives out a test to promote firefighters to position of Capitian. Frank Ricci, who dyslexic and can barely read has spent 7 months studying hours a day for the test. He spends money to get friends to record a audiobook version of the relevant text book for the promotion test. He works and works on his off hours. The test for promotions to Captain comes, Ricci takes the test. He gets one of the highest scores of all, placing 6th among 70 plus test-takers meaning his promotion is automatic. But the city of New Haven, not liking the racial composition of those who got good enough scores for promotions, throws the test and Ricci doesn't get the promotion he earned. Ricci sues for discrimination since he obviously didn't get his job because he was white but would of had he simply been black. 6 other firefighters who passed the test, including one hispanic firefighter, file suit along with Ricci. There case, Ricci v. DeStefano makes all the way to the 2nd Apellate Court. The city of New Havens argues that the test was discrimitory towards black test takers even the test was checked not once but twice by companys which speciliazed in identifying if a test is "racially baised" or not. They don't even show how any one question on the test could have been discrimatory. One Judge on the 2nd Apellate Court is Judge Sonya Sotomayor, who votes against Frank Ricci and gives a astonishingly short ruling nearly just a paragraph long. Obama who agreed with Sotomayor that the black testtakers in New Haven had been discriminated against despite all the evidence, nominates Sotomayor to be his nominee for the Supreme Court. At this time, The Supreme Court overturns the decision in Ricci v. DeStefano in favor of Frank Ricci. During Sotomayors nomination hearings, Senator John Kyl asks Judge Sotomayor what precedent she followed in ruling against Ricci and fails to even give an answer.

So Obama and his people won't even call the masscacre at Fort Hood "islamic terrorism" but they will say that the New Haven fire fighters test that was checked twice for discrimination and which was approved to not be discriminatory both times was racist allow them can't show 1 discrimatory question on it.

DUALITY 3
1. Obama spend millions to increase black history month funding and AIDS education in stimulus bill.

2. Obama doesn't spend a dime on the broken border.

DUALITY 4

1. And here's another story that shows how transparent and open to the public the Obama Adminstration is being: remember that polling station in Philadephia that the Black Panthers took over in full military regalia with weapons such as night sticks, intimidating and yelling racial slurs at whites trying to vote, telling one white guy, "Your about to be ruled by the black man, cracker!"? Well, the Bush adminstration justice department had begun the prosectution of the black panthers involved but couldn't finish the prosecution before the Obama adminstration came in last Januarary. And guess what? Eric Holder, decided to hault and end the entire case against the Black Panthers.

2. This is while Holder sues Georgia for the "crime" of reuiring that those who want to vote verify citizenship with a ID. This is "discrimatory" according to Obama's Justice Department. Are blacks not allowed to get ID's in Georgia? No, they can like anyone else, but Holder claims that requiring voters to prove citizenship (a pretty basic procedure i thought) "disportionately effects African Americans and Latinos". So its illegal for Georgia require ID to vote because Holder claims blacks will not bring ID more than whites? huh? What if whites where effected more than blacks by Georgia's ID requirment? Would Holder sue Georgia then for "discrimination"? I don't think so. The truth is that Holder simply wants to ensure a high black turn out and illegal immigrant turn out so that he can keep his office in the Justice Department another term. But lets review, according to Barak Obama and the head of the Department of Justice, Eric Holder: its ok for a gang of black panthers to forcibly take over a Philadephia polling booth with weapons, to intimidate voters, yell racial slurs at white voters, but its "illegal" for the state of Georgia to have any requirments to make sure non-citizens are voting by requiring those who want to vote to prove citizenship. And i wonder would Holder have prosecuted that Philadephia case if the KKK had forcibly taken hold of a Philadephia voting station and intimidated and yell racial slurs at black voters? Something tells me Holder not only would have prosecuted that case but that we would still be hearing about for 20 years on NPR, ABC, MSNBC, with 5 year commerations of what happened. Justice indeed, huh?
Anyway, it gets even worse, even more hyprocritical and ridiclous. So after Holder squashed the case against the black panthers, some Republicans in the Senate where honorable enough to demand a exsplanation on behalh of the Justice Department for why they stopped the prosecution. But the Obama Justice Department refused to exsplain why it squashed the case, defying precedent even the Bush adminstation had never flouted.



Too bad only the readers of the Drudge Report, National Review, Vdare.com and a few other sites even know about these outrages. When will the mainstream media awake from its honeymoon with the Obama Adminstration (literally cause they are marrying each other) and start to be journalists again? Or is Rachel Maddow just going to spend each day calling Tea Partyers racists in a different sly way?

The young potheads that elected Barak Obama have no idea what there guy has been doing in office, they don't give a damn, there doing kegstands right now. And yet they are always getting appluaded by the Maureen Dowds. Yet the older patriotic Americans who care and know enough about whats going on to actually partcipate in Democracy by protesting and going to town-halls and speeches and rallys, they get scorned by the Mainstream Media, Maureen Dowd villifys them because there not "diverse" enough, because she doesn't like there skin color and there age.

Reform. Change. Transperency. Bah Humbug.

More lies & All you need to know about Eric Holder's Justice Department

Worshipers at the altar of Obama, a poltician who would never lie to them, so they thought so credulously.
1.

Remember how those starry eyed youngsters gathered in Grant Park on election night last Novemember as Obama was elected and walked out on stage to address the nation? Well they were starry eyed mostly cause they were stoned (i know i saw them before they left on the El) but anyways those kids really believed Obama, despite his whole career in the Chicago Machine (and the whole biography of his they knew nothing about) that he was not a real politician. They thought he was Mr.Change, Mr. Reform, a guy who could never lie or double deal to get elected. Well, they still think for the same reason they thought that then. Why? Cause they didn't know anything about Obama then and they still don't today. That part of the nation gets roughly 1/10 the news of the day. Since there news outlets, NPR, ABC, and the like have gone on hiatus for the Obama adminstration and become PR firms working for the Whitehouse.

2.

They don't know for instance that Obama lied to them, time and time again, when he promised that the health care negoaitations would be televised on Cspan and that there would be no secret behind-closed-doors meetings, so that we can "whose working for the pharmecutical companys and whose working for the people" he said.
Well come a few ago, CSPAN said "We're Waiting?.........." to no avail. Obama simply lied. But did NPR tell you? Did MSNBC? How about Keith Oblermann? No, they where to busy talking about what Pat Robertson said about why the Hiatian Earthquake occured and distorting what, there favriote boogey-man, Rush Limbaugh said.
3.

And here's another story that shows how transparent and open to the public the Obama Adminstration is being: remember that polling station in Philadephia that the Black Panthers took over in full military regalia with weapons such as night sticks, intimidating and yelling racial slurs at whites trying to vote, telling one white guy, "Your about to be ruled by the black man, cracker!"? Well, the Bush adminstration justice department had begun the prosectution of the black panthers involved but couldn't finish the prosecution before the Obama adminstration came in last Januarary. And guess what? Eric Holder, decided to hault and end the entire case against the Black Panthers. This is while Holder sues Georgia for the "crime" of reuiring that those who want to vote verify citizenship with a ID. This is "discrimatory" according to Obama's Justice Department. Are blacks not allowed to get ID's in Georgia? No, they can like anyone else, but Holder claims that requiring voters to prove citizenship (a pretty basic procedure i thought) "disportionately effects African Americans and Latinos". So its illegal for Georgia require ID to vote because Holder claims blacks will not bring ID more than whites? huh? What if whites where effected more than blacks by Georgia's ID requirment? Would Holder sue Georgia then for "discrimination"? I don't think so. The truth is that Holder simply wants to ensure a high black turn out and illegal immigrant turn out so that he can keep his office in the Justice Department another term. But lets review, according to Barak Obama and the head of the Department of Justice, Eric Holder: its ok for a gang of black panthers to forcibly take over a Philadephia polling booth with weapons, to intimidate voters, yell racial slurs at white voters, but its "illegal" for the state of Georgia to have any requirments to make sure non-citizens are voting by requiring those who want to vote to prove citizenship. And i wonder would Holder have prosecuted that Philadephia case if the KKK had forcibly taken hold of a Philadephia voting station and intimidated and yell racial slurs at black voters? Something tells me Holder not only would have prosecuted that case but that we would still be hearing about for 20 years on NPR, ABC, MSNBC, with 5 year commerations of what happened. Justice indeed, huh?
Anyway, it gets even worse, even more hyprocritical and ridiclous. So after Holder squashed the case against the black panthers, some Republicans in the Senate where honorable enough to demand a exsplanation on behalh of the Justice Department for why they stopped the prosecution. But the Obama Justice Department refused to exsplain why it squashed the case, defying precedent even the Bush adminstation had never flouted.

The Black Panthers, night sticks in hand afront the Philadephia voting station, threatening a person taking a picture of there take over of the voting precinict.

Too bad only the readers of the Drudge Report, National Review, Vdare.com and a few other sites even know about these outrages. When will the mainstream media awake from its honeymoon with the Obama Adminstration (literally cause they are marrying each other) and start to be journalists again? Or is Rachel Maddow just going to spend each day calling Tea Partyers racists in a different sly way?

The young potheads that elected Barak Obama have no idea what there guy has been doing in office, they don't give a damn, there doing kegstands right now. And yet they are always getting appluaded by the Maureen Dowds. Yet the older patriotic Americans who care and know enough about whats going on to actually partcipate in Democracy by protesting and going to town-halls and speeches and rallys, they get scorned by the Mainstream Media, Maureen Dowd villifys them because there not "diverse" enough, because she doesn't like there skin color and there age.

Reform. Change. Transperency. Bah Humbug.

Friday, January 15, 2010

Jail our protectors & free our harraserers

It is so shameful that the Obama adminstration is putting heroes in jail cells to rot for life & for what? For defending themselves on the front line when they are in the line of fire or for making a terrorist vermin stand up for 24 hours to get life saving info. Sickening. And yet the black panthers get to take over voting stations harrasing & threatening white voters with slurs & weapons & Obama kills the prosecution of them & won't exsplain why.

Monday, December 28, 2009

Poltically Correct Amnesia: Eric Holder's minions rebuild the Sub Prime bubble

I wonder sometimes are the Obamites really so stupid to not realize forcing banks to give minoritys with bad credit loans is what created the housing boom and bust in the first place? I worry they haven't a clue. Certainly there actions suggest they are clueless,

Obama staffs the Justice Department to the hilt with all the most vile diversity consultants, race racketers, grievance mongers, discrimination lawyers (his former piers in other words) and sets them loose exactly as he promised at Spellmen Unviersity (atleast he doesn't lie to his "people"). Eric Holder has promised to double, triple, quadropole, the number of dispirate impact lawsuites and other various bullshit discrimination lawsuites all of which make an utter mockery of our Constuition (1776-1956).

And among the appauling lawsuites the newly radiclized Justice Department will be pumping out, will, no doubt be lawsuites against banks for not giving out "enough" loans to people of the preffered skin tone namely latinos and blacks-the two groups who where indispensable to the housing boom and bust which percipatated the fall of Lehman Brothers and whole god damn reccession. Ofcourse, the fact that the foreclosures where almost all happening in heavily latino sand states and in latino and black countys within those sand states, was far far too poltically incorrect to be reported by the mainstream media-no, to report that, would be "scape-goating". Well, this dirty little secret about who and what is to blame for the housing bust and the economic downturn has appeared in, atleast, Niall Ferguson's "The Ascent of Money" and Thomas Sowell's "The Housing Boom and Bust" two books that someone in the Obama white house should have read by now.

But ofcourse to come to terms with this unmentionable truth about the housing boom and bust would be to admit that goverment, not "greed" was the main culprit in the reccession which is a conclusion completly unsayable i am sure around the Obama White House. In case your late to this uncoventional truth, here's the low-down: Clinton and Bush, the whole Democratic Party and a scattering of Republican imposters supported raising latino and black home ownership by force. In order to create a latino and black ownership society by force, these Democrats and manifestly un-conservative Republicans used Freddy Mac and Fanny May and discrimination lawsuites to force private banks (unconstuinally) to give blacks and latinos with terrible credit loans they shouldn't have gotten.

Christmas day I came across a clip of the Democratic candiates youtube debate from 08'. The question poised to the candiates was "do you support reparations for slavery?". Ofcourse, they all dodge it by saying that they'll help blacks in better ways. Well John Edwards, abiding to this formula, answered,

"I'm not for reparations..but i think there are other things that we can do to create some equality that doesn't exist in this country today. Today, there was a report, right here in Charleston, African Americans are paying more than there white counterparts for morgatages than anyother place in America..and heres an example: what is the conceivable exsplanation for this? That black people are paying more for there morgatages? And, by the way, its not just low income African-Americans..there's absolutely no exsplanation for this. It goes to the basic question i just raised a minuete ago to have a President whose gonna fight for equality, fight for real change, big change, bold change. We're gonna have to have somebody,we can't change our insiders for there insiders, that doesn't work. What we need is somebody who will take these people on, these big banks, these morgatage companys, big insurance companys"

Edwards is advocating exactly what created the housing bubble which was the goverment in the name of "equality" (as always) putting its tantacles where it has no Constuinal right to be (e.i. suing Banks for not giving out, what they deem to be, "enough" loans and mortage to blacks no matter how bad there credit) and creating the sub prime housing market as a result that would fall apart and bring down the banks along the way. I find it hilarous that Edwards asks "what conceivable reason could there be for that?" refering to higher morgatage prices for blacks. Ofcourse, with our PC mufflers on, no one stood up and said "because blacks, very logically, have worse credit cause the are a more risky investment, more likely to be foreclosed upon as all the data shows." If someone had had the balls to do so maybe we would have avoided this whole mess and probably avoided the whole Obama nightmare along with it.

And so what is the morale of this story? It's quote obvious i think: the market was right! Blacks got loans less because they were a more risky investment, and so when DC liberals get involved in forcing businesses', in this case banks, to run there companies a certain way, they screw it all up.

And as i write, the Demoncats are revving up to involve themselves in the running of whole new sector of the economy-that which emits Co2 into the atomsphere. They-Pelosi, Reed and Obama and all the other liberals who have never run a company in there entire lives-say they know, as always, whats best for companys emiting Co2: that is that they need to "make a long term investment by switching to more green technologies". So why not just suggest this rather than try to force them to remodel by imposing onerous taxes on these companys in order to coerce such change? ......(no answer)....

What they don't get is that these companys who will be slammed hardest by cap and trade, first of all, know how to run there own companys better than say Nancy Pelosi does and they won't remodel there plants when cap and trade makes there doing business in America impossible, no, they'll just leave America and take there thousands of jobs with them. But then again the liberals don't seem to realize that companys can and do leave America for other countrys when they impose tax upon tax upon tax upon them.
Once again, with cap and trade as with so many other issues, the liberal takes 3 mental steps and the conservative takes 7. So in the case of cap and trade,

The Liberal Logic is: 1. the world is going to die 2. but we can save it 3. so we need to pass cap and trade or die and

The Conservative Logic is: 1. we don't know how much climate change is going to occur in what time frame 2. even if we knew how hot it will be in 40 years, we still need to know how much of that change is natural and how much is man made which again is a nearly impossible question to answer that we need to know more about 3. then even if Al Gore is right which at the least not clear we still need to know what it will take to prevent climate change and 4. can we have any viable impact making neglible cutbacks along with a few EU nations? 5. what is the cost vs. the benefit of cap and trade? 6. China and India alone will cancel out our tiny insubstanial cutbacks but we won't get the jobs that we loose because of cap and trade back again. no deal.

Now, what if John Edwards had gotten elected? He would have been saying after the reccession like all his party did "it was those greedy rich wall street guys who caused this! the problem is greed! the solution is goverment. It was deregulation of the housing sector that got us into this mess and it goverment thats gonna get us out of it"

And he would have gotten aplauded for that and the so called media wouldn't point out as the have yet to point that the people in goverment are at fault and obviously trying to deflect blame and responcibility to Wall Street.


Check out the video of John Edwards debate answer:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q5XAvfgpesU