Showing posts with label the Tea Partys. Show all posts
Showing posts with label the Tea Partys. Show all posts

Monday, January 18, 2010

More lies & All you need to know about Eric Holder's Justice Department

Worshipers at the altar of Obama, a poltician who would never lie to them, so they thought so credulously.
1.

Remember how those starry eyed youngsters gathered in Grant Park on election night last Novemember as Obama was elected and walked out on stage to address the nation? Well they were starry eyed mostly cause they were stoned (i know i saw them before they left on the El) but anyways those kids really believed Obama, despite his whole career in the Chicago Machine (and the whole biography of his they knew nothing about) that he was not a real politician. They thought he was Mr.Change, Mr. Reform, a guy who could never lie or double deal to get elected. Well, they still think for the same reason they thought that then. Why? Cause they didn't know anything about Obama then and they still don't today. That part of the nation gets roughly 1/10 the news of the day. Since there news outlets, NPR, ABC, and the like have gone on hiatus for the Obama adminstration and become PR firms working for the Whitehouse.

2.

They don't know for instance that Obama lied to them, time and time again, when he promised that the health care negoaitations would be televised on Cspan and that there would be no secret behind-closed-doors meetings, so that we can "whose working for the pharmecutical companys and whose working for the people" he said.
Well come a few ago, CSPAN said "We're Waiting?.........." to no avail. Obama simply lied. But did NPR tell you? Did MSNBC? How about Keith Oblermann? No, they where to busy talking about what Pat Robertson said about why the Hiatian Earthquake occured and distorting what, there favriote boogey-man, Rush Limbaugh said.
3.

And here's another story that shows how transparent and open to the public the Obama Adminstration is being: remember that polling station in Philadephia that the Black Panthers took over in full military regalia with weapons such as night sticks, intimidating and yelling racial slurs at whites trying to vote, telling one white guy, "Your about to be ruled by the black man, cracker!"? Well, the Bush adminstration justice department had begun the prosectution of the black panthers involved but couldn't finish the prosecution before the Obama adminstration came in last Januarary. And guess what? Eric Holder, decided to hault and end the entire case against the Black Panthers. This is while Holder sues Georgia for the "crime" of reuiring that those who want to vote verify citizenship with a ID. This is "discrimatory" according to Obama's Justice Department. Are blacks not allowed to get ID's in Georgia? No, they can like anyone else, but Holder claims that requiring voters to prove citizenship (a pretty basic procedure i thought) "disportionately effects African Americans and Latinos". So its illegal for Georgia require ID to vote because Holder claims blacks will not bring ID more than whites? huh? What if whites where effected more than blacks by Georgia's ID requirment? Would Holder sue Georgia then for "discrimination"? I don't think so. The truth is that Holder simply wants to ensure a high black turn out and illegal immigrant turn out so that he can keep his office in the Justice Department another term. But lets review, according to Barak Obama and the head of the Department of Justice, Eric Holder: its ok for a gang of black panthers to forcibly take over a Philadephia polling booth with weapons, to intimidate voters, yell racial slurs at white voters, but its "illegal" for the state of Georgia to have any requirments to make sure non-citizens are voting by requiring those who want to vote to prove citizenship. And i wonder would Holder have prosecuted that Philadephia case if the KKK had forcibly taken hold of a Philadephia voting station and intimidated and yell racial slurs at black voters? Something tells me Holder not only would have prosecuted that case but that we would still be hearing about for 20 years on NPR, ABC, MSNBC, with 5 year commerations of what happened. Justice indeed, huh?
Anyway, it gets even worse, even more hyprocritical and ridiclous. So after Holder squashed the case against the black panthers, some Republicans in the Senate where honorable enough to demand a exsplanation on behalh of the Justice Department for why they stopped the prosecution. But the Obama Justice Department refused to exsplain why it squashed the case, defying precedent even the Bush adminstation had never flouted.

The Black Panthers, night sticks in hand afront the Philadephia voting station, threatening a person taking a picture of there take over of the voting precinict.

Too bad only the readers of the Drudge Report, National Review, Vdare.com and a few other sites even know about these outrages. When will the mainstream media awake from its honeymoon with the Obama Adminstration (literally cause they are marrying each other) and start to be journalists again? Or is Rachel Maddow just going to spend each day calling Tea Partyers racists in a different sly way?

The young potheads that elected Barak Obama have no idea what there guy has been doing in office, they don't give a damn, there doing kegstands right now. And yet they are always getting appluaded by the Maureen Dowds. Yet the older patriotic Americans who care and know enough about whats going on to actually partcipate in Democracy by protesting and going to town-halls and speeches and rallys, they get scorned by the Mainstream Media, Maureen Dowd villifys them because there not "diverse" enough, because she doesn't like there skin color and there age.

Reform. Change. Transperency. Bah Humbug.

Sunday, January 3, 2010

How and why Obama supporters call those who don't worship at the altar of Obama racists




How Obama supporters talk about those who don't think Obama is god.

You see liberals (atleast a good deal of them) simply cannot accept that anyone can disagree with them and there saviour on legitimate grounds. Ofcourse they will deny this but if you are to judge them by what they say about the right it's quite clear the left can't think of any reason outside racism for not supporting Obama.

It tells you alot about the intelligence of the left wing. Let's see: 1.Obama has given us a 9 trillion dollar deficit 2. Passed a Stimulus bill full of junk that is only 25% a stimulus 3. given 30 billion away to 3rd dictators to do 'something' about climate change 3. hasn't spent a dime on the border while he spends trillions to increase AIDS awarness 4. let swine flu come into the country without any resitance 5. is pushing for amnesty at a time when 16 million people are unemployed 7. so much other shit. and they can't think of any reason for not loving the man?

This is why everytime you and I hear liberals talk about the opposition to Obama they always manage to, in the end, ascribing opposition to Obama whether outright or slyily to, you guessed it, that favriote liberal obbession: racism. They either say the following in some form or another:

1. These people just can't handle having a black man as president.

2. They're just bitter hicks who need to cling to there guns, there religon and there racism because they feel economically insecure.

3. They're just to dumb to realize there "class intrests" like african americans. They don't want to realize that Obama knows what best for them and that he is helping them.

4. These people are living in the past and they don't realize that things are changing (for the better ofcourse). They can't except progress cause there irrationally scared of change. They don't want to live in a society where black people have equality, where gay people receive basic human rights.

5. These Tea Partyers are just old racist white folks who still think blacks shouldn't be allowed to walk on the sidewalk and think blacks are only fit to wipe there shoes. They can't handle having a black man as president cause it threatens them.

6. The people who listen to Rush Limbaugh are just angry old white guys who are angry at the world and frustrated with there lives and jobs so they vent there anger and rage at Obama.

7. Not everyone is enlightned, the whole country has not entirely evolved yet. Some people like young people in the last election embrace change and progress full on but some people are scared of change and progress and evoultion. These Tea Parters are the same people who were protesting integration in the south in the 1960's. These are the people who look back upon segregation and slavery in this country with nostalgia. Not everyone liked Abraham Lincoln , not everyone liked Martin Luther King at the time. We can't except everyone too be for justice and progress.

It reveals everything i know to be true about how Democrats view Republicans to still be true when they claim opposition to Obama to be simple racism. That's how they see Republicans, as racists, because thats how Democrats must see Republicans. Because most Democrats are Democrats not because they've looked at the issues but because of what they don't want to be which is one of those unelightned racists on the right. They become Democrats because they want to be good people not like those mean, bad, racist people on the right. So if Republicans aren't the boogeymen and women then their liberalism is completly debased because the image of Republicans as evil, greedy, racist, yokel, crazies is why they came to the left in the first place. See to say Republicans don't oppose on racist grounds, would change there conception of American poltics entirely. They (i know as a former Democrats) see US poltics as a, essentially, a battle, more or less, between, good and evil, yokel v. scholar, KKK v. MLK, Chevy v. Volvo, Country v. Classic Rock, racist v. community organizer, ignorance v. knowledge, McDonalds v. Whole Foods, TV v. Books, etc. In other words, everything they hate v. everything they like. Cheney is evil and Obama is pure. But if you stop thinking that the Tea Partyers are protesting just cause they hate black people, then poltics becomes about issues and looses it's cosmic simplicity, and Democrats loose there certainty and might actually have to hear but sides out on indivivual issues and then you become a Republican.