That makes a lot of sense, except that establishing a guarantee of affordable health care is one of the things that would enable painful cuts in both the public and the private sector. If you know your health care is taken care of, then a cut in your projected pension becomes less threatening. It's less of a big deal to be downsized or outsourced, to give up your Detroit assembly line job (or D.C. newspaper job) and move to find work at some other company with a future. It's just money, then, not life or death. .And it's easier to jump at risks when there's a secure platform underneath you
Showing posts with label health care. Show all posts
Showing posts with label health care. Show all posts
Monday, February 1, 2010
good case for health care reform
from Mickey Kaus,
Obama's is placing America down the European path as the European abandon that route for a more (pre-Obama) US Route relizing bankruptcy of nannystat
Have you noticed anything missing from the health care "debate"? Any words, in paticular the utter absensce of which has become rather striking by now?
Have you eyed or eared the following word lately: Europe? No? Well me neither which is only yet another inditment of the quality of the healthcare tug of war which is currently on hiatus while Obama tries to shepered the passing of a "Jobs Bill" they very sound of which makes me reach for my wallet and my revolver.
One would think, if rationality where the animating force of the health care scuffle, there would have been tremendous debate about whether European style socialist health care and the European welfare state was such a smahing success.
My intuitive media radar tells me that, amazingly, no one has yet to point out the Democrats are trying to drag a unwilling America onto a path that the more socialistic west Europeans democracies went down decades ago and yetto go by what can roughly be called the on going healthcare debate you would think that that the Democrats want to do something entirely orginal that has never been tried before by nation(s). It seems strangely that it's the Democrats who don't want to talk about Europe and how all the policy they yearn for worked out in the long run in the nations who adopted these basic policies long ago. Right now, figuring out whether the story of goverment run health care was a triumph or a tragedy (or a tragedy waiting to happen) is clearly the most important question to answer in the short term. But the other items on the Obama agenda after healthcare have also been in Europe sometimes not so long ago really at all. Take, Cap & Trade, one of the worst items on the Obama wishlist and a issue unlike obamacare is easy to understand and easy to predict in all the terrible economic effects Cap & Trade will have and all the "transformative" enviomental effects it won't have as a result of reducing carbon emissions a neglible amount easily nullfied by all the co2 the devloping world emits. The only thing that Cap and trade will be help to cut back on is jobs and business in America, the neglible amount of Co2 we cut back will have no effect on the climate. No one serious denies that Cap & Traade is bad for Americans economically. Combined with the increased burdens plcaed on buisness big and small the increased cost of doing business here created by Cap & Trade will send business and corporations moving out of the country for good and taking their jobs with them as well as rapidly bring about a massive wave of outsourcing of jobs to Asian economies whichhave become far more buusiness friendly than the United States. The Democrats don't realize that America has to actually compete in this world to keep and to imaintain and increase the appeal of the American economny. Businessmen, investors, and people in today realize or atleast think that the United States is about to move to the left, Obama may loose in 2012 but the feeling is that he will invetiably be able to put in place huge liberal structural changes that will have the goverment running American healthcare among other changes, following the European model that has proved sucidial if not simply diastrous for Europe economically as well as socially stymmying entrupernership, indpdence and indutrury on the oart of the indivual and mking citizens into the children of the stat and, meanwhile, as America appears adamant upon followiwng Europe's exact footsteps of decline, the Asiatic nations of India, China, Singapore and the like appear to have learned in a deep way all the lessons that America has forgotten for the moment, about limited goverment, taxes and beyond.
Americans seem to be blind to the fact that they can no longe exspect for business to turn the other check again and againand not move its jobs out of America if the Democrats levy the burdens of obamacare on business, then increase the cost of doing business in America even more (and raise energy prices) ship away even more jobs with Cap & Trade those sacrficies would allresult in the cutting back of a negligible, insignifgant amount of co2-as the most honest green people will admit like Ralph Nader. So Cap & Trdae will, in summary, ship away millions of jobs , dramaticly increase the cost of doing business in America,raising food and energy prices and imposing the largest ever tax aka transfer of wealth from the people to the Goverment in our history and all these sacrficies will be for what "pay off"? "Green jobs" won't make up dir anything like the huge amount of jobs lost to asia as a result o this. But won't we save the earth? No, because Cap & Trade will have no apparent climatological benefit s for the very reason that theactual cut backs in Co2 will be neglibible and completly nullfied, canceled out and over come by the amount of the Co2 China and/or India alone will increasingly emit. Once you make it clear that there is no climatelogical signifgance the hapless true believers of Cap & Trade tell you that its good for the economy to deveolp "green technologies" the fact is that no one wants to 3 times as much money for clean solar energy shen you can get clean nuclear energy without the higher prices with nuclear power plants which don't emit Co2. One lesson that should be taken from France is that if America got as much of its energy from nuclear as France did, we would be well below the traget emissions reductions and unlike with solar and wind energy it wouldn't exact a completly unviable economic cost. The fact is that"green" technologies aren't good enough yet and that if we were smart we would invest in further research that could create better green techbologies. In short, Obama's talk of "green jobs" as the new base of the glorious new American ecoconomy is something only Ralph Nader could come up with. But then again China and India are making it clear they won't sign on to any global govermental climate change agency or treaty unless they receive payments in the billions from America as Obama has just done for Africa giving them a 100 billion dollars we don't have for corrupt African regimes to "prepare forclimate change". Coopenheganshould have been the definitive turning point for americans who realized that the whole summit was basically a 3rd world scheme to force America to essentially create a binding international govermental body that will allow Africa and some other 3rd world nations to vote themselves 100 of billions of Americantax payer dollars without consolntanting the American people , without Americans having any kind of veto. Essentially, if America wants to try new, alternative sources of energy it should build its self more nuclear power plants and force the Nevaians not to reneg on there contract and allow Yukka Mountain to be used as a place to store nuclear waste. Getting more of our energy from nuclear power will unlike unvialable solar and wind energy won't double the amount of money Americans pay for energy. Since no one but a minature elite with money to waste will buy into hugely exspensive solar & wind energy if they free market is allowed to decide it would way Obama will be able to deliver even a small portion any of the 2 million green jobs (which Obama, in speeches and in TV ad's has poytrayed as the new base of the US economny itself over more billionr Only if the goverment tyranically forces Americans and American companies into buying overly exspensive "green" energy with crackpot schemes like Cap & Trade.
This generation of Americans hasexspects continued prosperity to continue automatic as the divine state of American economomc and more problematicly many Americans, again on the left,have trouble accepting truths that aren't what they'd like them to be. This is true of Global WArming, race, diversity, immigration, education, latinos, latino assmilation, patriotism and IQ. But at the moment the first a nd most important bubble belief to popped is the multi-faceted global warming myth(s) that include 1. Al Gore's "science" is shaky at best and is all best on computer projection modeling, much of the data has been shown to be manupilated and less credible than before thought Thomas Friedman doesn't know how hot it will be in 87 years and at what rate it will get hot 2.No one has shown for sure how much climate changecurrently is effected by man made activetly versus the natural climate cycle 3. CHina and India and Russia and much if not all of the devolpoing world is totally opposed to the global goverment treay/entity that would hava to be created in order to enforce a serious climate change treaty, even if China and India did join in and allow intrusive inspection and not enough co@, according to Al GOre 's sources, would be cut (let alone in time) to have any real effect. In other words it can't be done now, unless some new method of cleaning the climate, like cloudwashing and that type of stuff that could to alot more for alot less money compared to economony killing stuff like Cap & Trade.
that will lead to the shipping away of millions of jobs to more attractive and in a way more stable Asian markets long & short term effects the which is easy to understand not endlessly complex, issue that issue whicv
and the success and failure and sustsenability of French and other european' countries health care
Have you eyed or eared the following word lately: Europe? No? Well me neither which is only yet another inditment of the quality of the healthcare tug of war which is currently on hiatus while Obama tries to shepered the passing of a "Jobs Bill" they very sound of which makes me reach for my wallet and my revolver.
One would think, if rationality where the animating force of the health care scuffle, there would have been tremendous debate about whether European style socialist health care and the European welfare state was such a smahing success.
My intuitive media radar tells me that, amazingly, no one has yet to point out the Democrats are trying to drag a unwilling America onto a path that the more socialistic west Europeans democracies went down decades ago and yetto go by what can roughly be called the on going healthcare debate you would think that that the Democrats want to do something entirely orginal that has never been tried before by nation(s). It seems strangely that it's the Democrats who don't want to talk about Europe and how all the policy they yearn for worked out in the long run in the nations who adopted these basic policies long ago. Right now, figuring out whether the story of goverment run health care was a triumph or a tragedy (or a tragedy waiting to happen) is clearly the most important question to answer in the short term. But the other items on the Obama agenda after healthcare have also been in Europe sometimes not so long ago really at all. Take, Cap & Trade, one of the worst items on the Obama wishlist and a issue unlike obamacare is easy to understand and easy to predict in all the terrible economic effects Cap & Trade will have and all the "transformative" enviomental effects it won't have as a result of reducing carbon emissions a neglible amount easily nullfied by all the co2 the devloping world emits. The only thing that Cap and trade will be help to cut back on is jobs and business in America, the neglible amount of Co2 we cut back will have no effect on the climate. No one serious denies that Cap & Traade is bad for Americans economically. Combined with the increased burdens plcaed on buisness big and small the increased cost of doing business here created by Cap & Trade will send business and corporations moving out of the country for good and taking their jobs with them as well as rapidly bring about a massive wave of outsourcing of jobs to Asian economies whichhave become far more buusiness friendly than the United States. The Democrats don't realize that America has to actually compete in this world to keep and to imaintain and increase the appeal of the American economny. Businessmen, investors, and people in today realize or atleast think that the United States is about to move to the left, Obama may loose in 2012 but the feeling is that he will invetiably be able to put in place huge liberal structural changes that will have the goverment running American healthcare among other changes, following the European model that has proved sucidial if not simply diastrous for Europe economically as well as socially stymmying entrupernership, indpdence and indutrury on the oart of the indivual and mking citizens into the children of the stat and, meanwhile, as America appears adamant upon followiwng Europe's exact footsteps of decline, the Asiatic nations of India, China, Singapore and the like appear to have learned in a deep way all the lessons that America has forgotten for the moment, about limited goverment, taxes and beyond.
Americans seem to be blind to the fact that they can no longe exspect for business to turn the other check again and againand not move its jobs out of America if the Democrats levy the burdens of obamacare on business, then increase the cost of doing business in America even more (and raise energy prices) ship away even more jobs with Cap & Trade those sacrficies would allresult in the cutting back of a negligible, insignifgant amount of co2-as the most honest green people will admit like Ralph Nader. So Cap & Trdae will, in summary, ship away millions of jobs , dramaticly increase the cost of doing business in America,raising food and energy prices and imposing the largest ever tax aka transfer of wealth from the people to the Goverment in our history and all these sacrficies will be for what "pay off"? "Green jobs" won't make up dir anything like the huge amount of jobs lost to asia as a result o this. But won't we save the earth? No, because Cap & Trade will have no apparent climatological benefit s for the very reason that theactual cut backs in Co2 will be neglibible and completly nullfied, canceled out and over come by the amount of the Co2 China and/or India alone will increasingly emit. Once you make it clear that there is no climatelogical signifgance the hapless true believers of Cap & Trade tell you that its good for the economy to deveolp "green technologies" the fact is that no one wants to 3 times as much money for clean solar energy shen you can get clean nuclear energy without the higher prices with nuclear power plants which don't emit Co2. One lesson that should be taken from France is that if America got as much of its energy from nuclear as France did, we would be well below the traget emissions reductions and unlike with solar and wind energy it wouldn't exact a completly unviable economic cost. The fact is that"green" technologies aren't good enough yet and that if we were smart we would invest in further research that could create better green techbologies. In short, Obama's talk of "green jobs" as the new base of the glorious new American ecoconomy is something only Ralph Nader could come up with. But then again China and India are making it clear they won't sign on to any global govermental climate change agency or treaty unless they receive payments in the billions from America as Obama has just done for Africa giving them a 100 billion dollars we don't have for corrupt African regimes to "prepare forclimate change". Coopenheganshould have been the definitive turning point for americans who realized that the whole summit was basically a 3rd world scheme to force America to essentially create a binding international govermental body that will allow Africa and some other 3rd world nations to vote themselves 100 of billions of Americantax payer dollars without consolntanting the American people , without Americans having any kind of veto. Essentially, if America wants to try new, alternative sources of energy it should build its self more nuclear power plants and force the Nevaians not to reneg on there contract and allow Yukka Mountain to be used as a place to store nuclear waste. Getting more of our energy from nuclear power will unlike unvialable solar and wind energy won't double the amount of money Americans pay for energy. Since no one but a minature elite with money to waste will buy into hugely exspensive solar & wind energy if they free market is allowed to decide it would way Obama will be able to deliver even a small portion any of the 2 million green jobs (which Obama, in speeches and in TV ad's has poytrayed as the new base of the US economny itself over more billionr Only if the goverment tyranically forces Americans and American companies into buying overly exspensive "green" energy with crackpot schemes like Cap & Trade.
This generation of Americans hasexspects continued prosperity to continue automatic as the divine state of American economomc and more problematicly many Americans, again on the left,have trouble accepting truths that aren't what they'd like them to be. This is true of Global WArming, race, diversity, immigration, education, latinos, latino assmilation, patriotism and IQ. But at the moment the first a nd most important bubble belief to popped is the multi-faceted global warming myth(s) that include 1. Al Gore's "science" is shaky at best and is all best on computer projection modeling, much of the data has been shown to be manupilated and less credible than before thought Thomas Friedman doesn't know how hot it will be in 87 years and at what rate it will get hot 2.No one has shown for sure how much climate changecurrently is effected by man made activetly versus the natural climate cycle 3. CHina and India and Russia and much if not all of the devolpoing world is totally opposed to the global goverment treay/entity that would hava to be created in order to enforce a serious climate change treaty, even if China and India did join in and allow intrusive inspection and not enough co@, according to Al GOre 's sources, would be cut (let alone in time) to have any real effect. In other words it can't be done now, unless some new method of cleaning the climate, like cloudwashing and that type of stuff that could to alot more for alot less money compared to economony killing stuff like Cap & Trade.
that will lead to the shipping away of millions of jobs to more attractive and in a way more stable Asian markets long & short term effects the which is easy to understand not endlessly complex, issue that issue whicv
and the success and failure and sustsenability of French and other european' countries health care
Monday, January 18, 2010
More lies & All you need to know about Eric Holder's Justice Department
Worshipers at the altar of Obama, a poltician who would never lie to them, so they thought so credulously.Remember how those starry eyed youngsters gathered in Grant Park on election night last Novemember as Obama was elected and walked out on stage to address the nation? Well they were starry eyed mostly cause they were stoned (i know i saw them before they left on the El) but anyways those kids really believed Obama, despite his whole career in the Chicago Machine (and the whole biography of his they knew nothing about) that he was not a real politician. They thought he was Mr.Change, Mr. Reform, a guy who could never lie or double deal to get elected. Well, they still think for the same reason they thought that then. Why? Cause they didn't know anything about Obama then and they still don't today. That part of the nation gets roughly 1/10 the news of the day. Since there news outlets, NPR, ABC, and the like have gone on hiatus for the Obama adminstration and become PR firms working for the Whitehouse.
2.
They don't know for instance that Obama lied to them, time and time again, when he promised that the health care negoaitations would be televised on Cspan and that there would be no secret behind-closed-doors meetings, so that we can "whose working for the pharmecutical companys and whose working for the people" he said.
Well come a few ago, CSPAN said "We're Waiting?.........." to no avail. Obama simply lied. But did NPR tell you? Did MSNBC? How about Keith Oblermann? No, they where to busy talking about what Pat Robertson said about why the Hiatian Earthquake occured and distorting what, there favriote boogey-man, Rush Limbaugh said.
3.
And here's another story that shows how transparent and open to the public the Obama Adminstration is being: remember that polling station in Philadephia that the Black Panthers took over in full military regalia with weapons such as night sticks, intimidating and yelling racial slurs at whites trying to vote, telling one white guy, "Your about to be ruled by the black
man, cracker!"? Well, the Bush adminstration justice department had begun the prosectution of the black panthers involved but couldn't finish the prosecution before the Obama adminstration came in last Januarary. And guess what? Eric Holder, decided to hault and end the entire case against the Black Panthers. This is while Holder sues Georgia for the "crime" of reuiring that those who want to vote verify citizenship with a ID. This is "discrimatory" according to Obama's Justice Department. Are blacks not allowed to get ID's in Georgia? No, they can like anyone else, but Holder claims that requiring voters to prove citizenship (a pretty basic procedure i thought) "disportionately effects African Americans and Latinos". So its illegal for Georgia require ID to vote because Holder claims blacks will not bring ID more than whites? huh? What if whites where effected more than blacks by Georgia's ID requirment? Would Holder sue Georgia then for "discrimination"? I don't think so. The truth is that Holder simply wants to ensure a high black turn out and illegal immigrant turn out so that he can keep his office in the Justice Department another term. But lets review, according to Barak Obama and the head of the Department of Justice, Eric Holder: its ok for a gang of black panthers to forcibly take over a Philadephia polling booth with weapons, to intimidate voters, yell racial slurs at white voters, but its "illegal" for the state of Georgia to have any requirments to make sure non-citizens are voting by requiring those who want to vote to prove citizenship. And i wonder would Holder have prosecuted that Philadephia case if the KKK had forcibly taken hold of a Philadephia voting station and intimidated and yell racial slurs at black voters? Something tells me Holder not only would have prosecuted that case but that we would still be hearing about for 20 years on NPR, ABC, MSNBC, with 5 year commerations of what happened. Justice indeed, huh?Anyway, it gets even worse, even more hyprocritical and ridiclous. So after Holder squashed the case against the black panthers, some Republicans in the Senate where honorable enough to demand a exsplanation on behalh of the Justice Department for why they stopped the prosecution. But the Obama Justice Department refused to exsplain why it squashed the case, defying precedent even the Bush adminstation had never flouted.
The Black Panthers, night sticks in hand afront the Philadephia voting station, threatening a person taking a picture of there take over of the voting precinict.Too bad only the readers of the Drudge Report, National Review, Vdare.com and a few other sites even know about these outrages. When will the mainstream media awake from its honeymoon with the Obama Adminstration (literally cause they are marrying each other) and start to be journalists again? Or is Rachel Maddow just going to spend each day calling Tea Partyers racists in a different sly way?
The young potheads that elected Barak Obama have no idea what there guy has been doing in office, they don't give a damn, there doing kegstands right now. And yet they are always getting appluaded by the Maureen Dowds. Yet the older patriotic Americans who care and know enough about whats going on to actually partcipate in Democracy by protesting and going to town-halls and speeches and rallys, they get scorned by the Mainstream Media, Maureen Dowd villifys them because there not "diverse" enough, because she doesn't like there skin color and there age.
Reform. Change. Transperency. Bah Humbug.
Monday, December 28, 2009
Amnesty: the Sequel & the most absurd name for a bill in 2009 Award goes to......
....................local up n' coming artist of treason, Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-IL) who has just a this very week introduced the American apcolpayse to the legsliative pipeline in the form of an amnesty bill called:
the “Comprehensive Immigration Reform for America’s Security and Prosperity Act of 2009″ (H.R. 4321).
It is sponsored by Rep. Solomon Ortiz (D-TX) and has a total of 92 co-sponsors, all who are Democrats. I wonder why the two co-shepards of an amnesty bill at a time of massive unemployment are latino? Could it be for the same reason why LA RAZA is the only group lobbying for free non-emergency (e.i. Aderral prescriptions on us) obamacare for 20 million illegal? Could it be.....that amnesty as with free obamacare (e.i. free prescriptions for 20 million illegals) is good for Mexicans in America (and those Mexicans waiting for obamacare to pass) but not very good, infact, very fucking bad for, say, Americans (of the non-hyphonitated non-dual loyality variety,) who will pay 1. pay for 20 mill poor uneducated Mexican's health care, education, and welfare and 2. will have to compete with 20 million new (unpatriotic) citizens for jobs (16 million Americans are already unemplyed by the way, great way to help them out. huh?).
The very proposing, the very suggestion of, let alone the introduction of an amnesty bill at this time inwhich 16 million Americans are unemployed is a insult in itself. Period. But Guiterez's amnesty bill for "America's death and destructuion" adds insult to injury to in one of the bill's eyebrow raising provisions. This is ends all questions about where the loyality of Rep. Guiterez and Oritz lies.
THE BILL PROHIBITS THE ENFORCMENT OF OUR FEDERAL IMMIGRATION LAWS IN ALL THE FOLLOWING SETTINGS:
SEC. 157. PROTECTION OF COMMUNITY-BASED ORGANIZATIONS, FAITH-BASED ORGANIZATIONS AND OTHER INSTITUTIONS.
(1) prohibit the apprehension of persons on the
premises or in the immediate vicinity of—
(A) a childcare provider;
(B) a school;
(C) a legal-service provider;
(D) a Federal court or State court proceeding;
(E) an administrative proceeding;
(F) a funeral home;
(G) a cemetery;
(H) a college, university, or community college;
(I) a victim services agency;
(J) a social service agency;
(K) a hospital or emergency care center;
(L) a health care clinic;
(M) a place of worship;
(N) a day care center;
(O) a head start center;
(P) a school bus stop;
(Q) a recreation center;
(R) a mental health facility; and
(S) a community center;
What does this say, to an illegal alien? It says "hey spend your time at any of the following places cause police can't enforce the law at any of them." And Luis Guiterez knows this, he is certainly sending a message to the group he cares about: his fellow Mexicans.
And notice how Guiterez's bill says that ICE and the Police can't do there job and apprehend criminals who broke into the nation even if there a criminal, not only if the illegal fugitive is at any of those listed placed but that they can't even apprhend an illegal criminal in the "vicinity" of any such locations. This is no accident. What does "vicinity" entail? A 20 foot radius around a building? Guiterez leaves this "vicinity" loophole on purpose, once again, to obviously help his brothers out (his brothers being Mexicans legal or illegal).
SO WHO DECIDE'S WHAT THE "VICINITY" IS?
(b) NOTICE TO APPEAR.—The Secretary shall amend the Notice to Appear form to include a statement that no immigration enforcement activity was undertaken in any of the locations described in subsection.
So the Democrats essentially get to make there own comitte and secreterary to decide if an illegal was arrested in the "vicinity" of a building or not. Surely, they will apoint the former head of LA RAZA, some well known treasonist friend of illegal immigrants who probably thinks it out of the question to build a border.
Some believe that “The Secretary” that would be the Secretary of Labor who would be the de facto enforcer of the sanctuary areas which would be ridiclous because enforcing our immigration laws, apprhending illegals is not a "labor issue" but primarily a matter for the Department of Homeland Security which is run by the terrible lesbian liar, Janet Napolitano who is although downright applauling in her utter neglect for the border especially during swine flu, but Napolitano as bad as she beats having the even more overtly disloyal latino, Hilda Solis deciding wheather to allow illegals to hide in Sanctuary Citys and Sanctuary Hide outs (for Solis will surely do all she can for her Mexican brothers and sisters).
In this case it seems that “The Secretary” is the Secretary of Labor would be the enforcer of the sanctuary areas. Wouldn’t that be the job of the DHS? Janet Napolitano sure wouldn’t be happy if Hilda Solis was stepping on her toes.
This means that if the Police know a illegal who has robbed a store, they can't go get him if he's hiding in a ACORN office.
And i assure you that this bill has not been covered and if and when it does go somewhere in the Congress, the Media outside FOX won't give a moments notice and if they do they won't mention this absurd list of sancutuary locations for illegals to hide from the law enforcment at. All this list is designed to do is to make it far more difficult for ICE agents to do there job. This is a goal of Democrats that isn't reported, but they do it at all levels of goverment:the goal is to make it is hard as possible if not illegal for law enforcement to enforce our immigration laws. They vote against a border. They vote to make it illegal for cops to ask non-english speaking latino robbers if there citizens (even when there in our jails!) and they Unconstuitionally declare there towns and citys official or de facto "Sanctuary Citys" and give illegals Sanctuary hang-outs for illegals nationwide as Guiterez desires to do in this bill.
So let me get this straight, assuming Obamacare passes by tommorow, illegals who break our laws get from us:
1. Hundred's of miles of wide open southern border to walk right through, equipt with trails for thousands of illegals to walk back and fourth through as if in a national park. (Note: it costs as much as the wars in the middle east for 1 month of fighting to build a impentrable southern border. It would pay for itself in 2 years tops and save thousands of people lives who die every year from immigrant diseases (e.g. swine flu has killed 90 thousand) not to mention illegal drunk drivers and murderers. Keep this figure in mind .)
2. Once you have snuck into America illegally, you can walk into any hospital and are legally entitled to receive health care. No citizens verification system exists with Obamacare thanks to the Democrats efforts voting down GOP attempts to create a system to weed out illegals from citizens. You can have a 60,000 brain surgery and 2 month hospital stay and the American tax payer will pay for the whole cost of it. Your uncle Miguel has clogged artirarys but doesn't want to pay for surgery, you say? Well go back to Mexico City, take the next bus back to Tijuana and walk into El Paso and the American Tax payer will pay for your Uncle Miguels 12 thousand dollars surgery and 7 grand hospital stay! Do you have trouble focusing? Well, we'll pay for aderll presciptions for you too at a cost of 50$ a refill (30 refills a year) for as long as you need it! Have you brought your family across the border with you, too? Don't worry we'll pay for there 367$ monthly parmuctetical bill for your 3 daughters Xanax and your wive's Aderall. How long will the goverment pay for my family pharmuctical bill? As long as you and your family need it silly. And you don't care that i'm an illegal immigrant? Ofcourse not, all we care about is keeping people that are here healthy, so that they don't get sick and cost us more in the long run, you see? Uh huh, thats very generous of the American people but aren't you going to call the police to arrest me cause i'm an illegal? No, no. That would be against the law. You can't arrest an "undocumented" person if there in a all hospital, as with 45 other types of places.
3. Once you get all the free healthcare you and your family desire, then receive 12 years of free public education plus a college scholarship of your choice. Each year we spend 17,000 on an indivual student. So if you have 4 kids you brought with you across the border then we have to educate them all for 12 years at a cost of around 60,000 per year multipled by 12 years plus a free college tuition that costs 23,000 a year courtesy of the US tax payer. Oh yea and all community college classes are free for illegals too thanks to the "STRIVE" act.
4. So you've gotten your free healthcare, free education for your kids, now get your free welfare services.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)