All You Need To About Global Warming Profiteers

Al Gore's flock claim, with their usually uncanny certitude (e.g. "It will be this cold in 200 years!") that we only have about 10-15 YEARS till its too late to avert "diaster" (by the way:in 20 yrs. they'll be saying we have "10 years left") If they were not lying they would be THE BIGGEST FANS OF NUCLEAR POWER IN THE WORLD b/c they'd realize 1.There's no chance of switching EVEN 30% OF THE US ECONOMY (which would do nothing if u could) to solar & etc.because Americans wont pay 3 times more for energy but they will switch to non poulluting nuclear power which is very cheap. So the alarmists if they belived their b.s. would comprmise to save the "earth".

"YOU IDIOTS!"

1. Just a moment ago, liberal arrogance once again creeped into my life (despite my efforts. I saw the cover of the most recent Rolling Stone magazaine, which reads in big red letters "You Idiots!:the people who are getting in the way of climate change action".

It shows just how unintelligent these Gorite elements on the left are, that they don't even know that they are the ones making the audicious claims that people should be skeptical, at the very least, about.

2. One of the most ubiqitous ironies in contemporary American politics is the left's obbession with McCrathyism, which is, far and away, the most overblown so call "scandal" in American history. Thanks to the lefts lock on the neth-worlds of academia and media they have succeded in producing a mountain of films about McCrathyism and have produced US History textbooks which fail to mention Paul Reveere at all, Alexander Hamilton 3 times, John Marshall not at all but manage to mention the KKK 33 times and McCarthyism 39 times (and poltical correctness never). The irony is not the bias as much as the fact that the true McCarthists (if anybody is to be compared) of the last 40 years have been leftists not conservatives. I'd go as far as saying that the New McCarthyism of Potical Correctness is worse than McCarthyism itself. For one, McCarthyism last all but around half a decade. The imfamous "blacklists" aside, not that many innocent people (who weren't communists) where "ruined" by Joe McCarthy. You can't as many on one hand. The bulk of those who where negatively effected by McCarthy where often actually reds and they merely changed there pen names and continued to work in hollywood or they took a hiatus for a little and came back to Hollywood soon enough. McCarthy blowed over and he was a villian already by the 60's, his "victims" where accepted right back into hollywood or goverment and so on. And again there where not many victims despite the tens of thousands you would except there to be based on how many movies, plays and novels we've seen on McCarthyism. Poltical Correctness has hand probably over 200 percent more victims than McCarthyism and the victims have been victimized much more severely, losing jobs held for 50 years with noted brillance for the offence of innocently using the word un-racist "niggardly" in a document and other similiarly outrages intstances which unlike with McCarthyism can't be counted on a hand but would require a 700 page book to chronicle them all. Finally, unlike poltical correctness, McCarthyism, was mostly true in the sense that there where contrary to what most think, many communists and communists spies within the annals of the US goverment as the Alger Hiss case showed dating back to the 20's and 30's all the way up to the 50's. Poltical Correctness' claims of the boogeyman of white racism have, atleast, for the last 20 years been far far more sperious. And look McCarthyism only last half a decade at the end of which McCarthy was roundly discredited and denounced. Poltical Correctness reign of terror, if you will, has continued for roughly 4 decades and isn't discredited and diavowed by the mainstream at all, rather it is the mainstream (though it becomes less reveered with every passing day as its antics and claims of "racism" under every rock become ever-more clearly deseperate and slanderous. Here is one telling instance which reveals just how "tolerant" the left is and just how un-McCarthyite they are today. James D. Watson, our greatest living scienist, the man who discovered DNA in his 20's! He went on to found Cold Spring Harbour and teach at Harvard for 50 years. He gives a interview in London recently and says that we should lower our exspectations of Africa catching up to the West economically and so fourth considering that blacks have lower IQ's than Europeans (a fact). For mentioning that un-PC fact about IQ distrubution between the races Watson is dismissed as head of the labrotory he founded and built up from the ground for 50 years, Cold Spring Harbour and is roundedly diowned and shunned by academia and "respectable" PC society. Now who are the people smashing Galielo's telescopes?

The appauling arrogance of the left's global warming assertions

This is how the left talks about climate change. (Pay paticular attention to the condescion of Bob Shrum)

I rarely feel like straggling the person i disagree with. Only when the liberal pulls out the condescending grin do i get the urge bludgeon there arrogant faces to they look like a egg yoke and hamburger helper. Surely, you know the look? It is the classic liberal poise: ya know, the snob skoffing at your "ridiclous", "laughable", suggestion that there could be any debate about climate change. They oscillate between yelling "There is no debate about the facts of global warming!" and "No serious scientists disagree!" and grinning like jackasses on happy gas.

You can see exactly what i mean in the link above.

They laugh at any suggestion that "the debate is over". Then Prince Charles gets up on the rostrum in Coopnhegan and says "We have 7 years until" we lose all hope of averting diaster. And what i presume the "debate is over" about that too? Once you say "the debate is over about climate change", "all serious scientists agree" i guess if you fool people that far then you can just say whatever you want.
I would call these people hucksters because they are using climate change and false claims about it to steal people's money and gain control of the economy but they- Al Gore, Obama-don't even seem to realize that there being fooled by the African delegate hucksters demanding money out of there "deep concern about climate change" (sure Robert Mugabe).

Here's my question for Al Gore and his cru of power hungry liars:

You say the debate is over. Well i assume you've thus long ago answered the following questions, can you let me in on the answers to them and your proof of why your answers are "undebateable":

1. How much will the sea rise in the next 60 years? How much hotter will it be? How bout' in 200 years? How fast will the climate change? What effect will it have on America, etc? Show me how you know this for a fact.

2. How much of this change is caused by man-made activity and/or Co2 and how much of this change is part of the natural climate cycle (since the climate is always changing and always has been well before humans evolved)? How much climate change is the result of changes in sun spots, the ozone layer and other non-man-made factors? Show me how you know this.

3. Can this climate change be stopped? What will it take? How do you know?

4. Are the cutbacks needed to slow or stop climate viable?

5. Will America and a few EU nations making slight cutbacks in Co2 make any difference when China and India are emitting more than we save?


These are the 5 questions which have to be answered in order to act intelligently on climate change (if it is as Gore's prediction claim). Yet none of them have at all been answered. Yet Gore says "the debate is over" about them.
To say the "debate is over" is such a amazingly arrogant statement because these above questions are almost impossibly difficult to answer and his statements like Obama and all the other alarmists statements say that these questions are easy have long ago been answered and there is no debate about what the answer is. Who can say that there is no debate about how hot it will be in a century? no debate about how much cutbacks will have to be made to have a effect?

The fact Al Gore doesn't want people to know is that human activity accounts for 2% percent of Co2 emitted. Animals emit more carbon into the atomsphere than cars by a factor of over 20.