Democrats propose 1.9 Billion $ increase in debt limit.
Which makes me think....didn't Barak Obama claim on ABC not long ago that what would cost the most money and increase the deficet the most drastically would be to NOT pass the hugely exspensive healthcare bills. I repeat he said it would be the fiscally responcible think to do, according to Obama, to pass a hugely exspensive healthcare bill when we are allready over 12 trillion dollars deep in debt. I wonder: would the Democrats need to attempt to increase the debt limit if we didn't pass the healthcare bill(s)? Don't think so.
Also, on the Obama lying front, didn't Obama claim on national television when speaking to the Senate and on numerous occasions that none of the health care bills would increase the deficit by "one red cent"? Well we can see that was a bunch of horse shit right now (as we could have known well before now of course).
By the way, if we had the same kind of skeptical advserarial media that existed towards Bush now in the Obama years (which we obviously don't) the media would be pointing out these things and bloggers wouldn't have to shout it from rooftops.
Showing posts with label debt. Show all posts
Showing posts with label debt. Show all posts
Wednesday, January 20, 2010
Tuesday, January 5, 2010
Californian Warning: The Perils of Diversity in Democracies

The fact that California is falling apart at the seems and so deep in debt that its now pleading for a federal bailout, should be taken as a warning of the perils of allowing our southern border to be over run by millions of Mexicans who, our own goverment goes out of it's way to give free welfare money to (not to mention free education, scholarships, health care & public services). Its not just perilous to our debt and to bankrupted hospitals but to our very democracy. Democracy cannot work if a large chunk of it's participants hold allegiances to another country entirely. The electrate at the mininum has to share some general intrest in the prosperity of America as opposed to, say, Peru or Somalia. For instance, in California everyone knows the obvious solution to the debt crisis, namely stop giving illegal immigrants trillions of tax payer money. Why don't they do it? Why does Arnold Schwarzenegger (the Micheal Bloomberg of California), pretend and the whole state assembly pretend they cant save any money or make any more cuts? Because California is now over half latino & to tell the truth is poltical sucide because half the population are Mexicans who could give a damn about America's debt as long as they and there illegal immigrant brothers and sisters get there spoils.
It's obvious latinos, as a whole, are competly indifferent to the plight of non-latino Americans. They look out for there own. Are you to tell me the reason LA RAZA is the only group advocating for exsplicit non-emergency free goverment funding health care for 20 million illegals is because they think that it would be bad for America if 20 million illegals couldn't get free surgerys and aderall presciptions on the tab of the American tax payer? No, the reason latino groups are always the ones standing up to protest efforts to enforce our immigration laws, to use e-verify to make sure illegals aren't taking Americans jobs, is that latino groups and latino polticians are looking out for latinos not Americans. How will amnesty for 20 million illegal immigrants at a time when almost 20 million Americans are unemployed be good for America? I have yet to get one liberal to answer that question. But i can tell you how amnesty for 20 million illegal immigrants will be good for 20 million illegal immigrants. That's easy.
This is all fucking obvious, any honest, rational person can see the truth about LA RAZA and latino-Americans, in general. There not bad people, there not inferiour. No, there simply disloyal to America. If you need even more evidence of what is right before our eyes, then i direct you to the slew of polls and studies that all show the same disloyality of Mexican-Americans time and time again. Ofcourse, i should make something of a exception for Cubans.
And the fact that we can't call it like it is, the fact that we cannot say what has been shown to be true about Mexican immigrants will be the downfall of this nation. In effect, the poltically correct police will not allow any person of promience to even identify the threat of immigration. We are not allowed to even warn the public of the consquences of open borders and mass immigration and inturn ofcourse the public will not pay attention.
Labels:
California,
debt,
democracy,
demographics,
diversity,
lies,
prison,
Schwarznegger
Monday, December 28, 2009
Is Obama a liar or just deluded?
"In the long run we can't continue to spend as if deficits don't have consequences, as if waste doesn't matter, as if the hard earned tax dollars of the American people can be treated like monopoly money, that's what we've seen time and time again … Washington has put off hard choices spending bill... after spending bill, budget after budget."
-Barak Obama (speaking to ABC this week)
This reminds one of Obama's claim early on as President that, "i don't believe in big goverment". Our President seems to have the disconcerting ability to say anything no matter how ridiclous. It's like he's a machine and David Axelrod just inserts the script into the back of Obama's head before every interview and speech he does. The alarming aspect of this statement is the questions it raises about Obama: does he believe the bullshit coming out of his mouth or is this all talking points & manuevering. I hope he isn't so deluded to be sincerely saying the above words but increasingly i believe Obama to be far less intelligent than everyone assumes him to be (partially to be honest, because Bush set the bar so low & partly because of Obama's skin color makes his statements seem smart when coming from a white guys mouth his words would sound like the un-remarkable, rather bland poltical-speak it is). My doubts about Obama's purported awesome intelligence were aroused chiefly during the campaign when Obama said that he thought American unviersitys were sorely lacking in "oppression studies classes". I don't even know a liberal in my own life so out of touch with reality to have made such a patently absurd claim. But on a deeper level, to think colleges need more black studies, metizo studies, womens studies b.s. classes is tanatmount to saying that college's are too conservative. It suggests, if not indeed, shows that Obama doesn't even realize what even most liberals today admit about colleges which is that they have way to many of these ridiclous "oppression studies classes" with names like "White supremacy and native american gay consciousness: the fight for social justice", which are the very classes Obama said that college's didn't have enough of.When you think about, it's a statement too dumb for the Obama we know. All the thing is that we don't know Obama. We know the guy who gives the pompous sappy speeches on TV, thats about all. But it sounds like something a 20 year memember of Trinity United Church would utter.
Whenever Obama makes these "is he serious?" type statements designed, i hope, to show how moderate and fiscally conservative he is, i always think "And they called Bush a liar for getting faulty intelligence about "yellow cake"?" Obama has been in office for a year and he has already blatantly lied, to my count, atleast 2-3 times. Does the above count as a lie? I hope so, i hope our President isn't so deluded that he believes the words coming out of his mouth when he says these things. I hope he's just devious.
The good news is that i am certain that Obama's bold face lying/posing is not going to work on the American people, as it did in the election when one poll showed 20 percent more people thought Obama was more fiscally conservative than McCain. Though that is was reflection as much on Obama's poltical savy as McCain's senility as a candiate with one foot in the grave.
-Barak Obama (speaking to ABC this week)
This reminds one of Obama's claim early on as President that, "i don't believe in big goverment". Our President seems to have the disconcerting ability to say anything no matter how ridiclous. It's like he's a machine and David Axelrod just inserts the script into the back of Obama's head before every interview and speech he does. The alarming aspect of this statement is the questions it raises about Obama: does he believe the bullshit coming out of his mouth or is this all talking points & manuevering. I hope he isn't so deluded to be sincerely saying the above words but increasingly i believe Obama to be far less intelligent than everyone assumes him to be (partially to be honest, because Bush set the bar so low & partly because of Obama's skin color makes his statements seem smart when coming from a white guys mouth his words would sound like the un-remarkable, rather bland poltical-speak it is). My doubts about Obama's purported awesome intelligence were aroused chiefly during the campaign when Obama said that he thought American unviersitys were sorely lacking in "oppression studies classes". I don't even know a liberal in my own life so out of touch with reality to have made such a patently absurd claim. But on a deeper level, to think colleges need more black studies, metizo studies, womens studies b.s. classes is tanatmount to saying that college's are too conservative. It suggests, if not indeed, shows that Obama doesn't even realize what even most liberals today admit about colleges which is that they have way to many of these ridiclous "oppression studies classes" with names like "White supremacy and native american gay consciousness: the fight for social justice", which are the very classes Obama said that college's didn't have enough of.When you think about, it's a statement too dumb for the Obama we know. All the thing is that we don't know Obama. We know the guy who gives the pompous sappy speeches on TV, thats about all. But it sounds like something a 20 year memember of Trinity United Church would utter.
Whenever Obama makes these "is he serious?" type statements designed, i hope, to show how moderate and fiscally conservative he is, i always think "And they called Bush a liar for getting faulty intelligence about "yellow cake"?" Obama has been in office for a year and he has already blatantly lied, to my count, atleast 2-3 times. Does the above count as a lie? I hope so, i hope our President isn't so deluded that he believes the words coming out of his mouth when he says these things. I hope he's just devious.
The good news is that i am certain that Obama's bold face lying/posing is not going to work on the American people, as it did in the election when one poll showed 20 percent more people thought Obama was more fiscally conservative than McCain. Though that is was reflection as much on Obama's poltical savy as McCain's senility as a candiate with one foot in the grave.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)