The Last WASP: Will Obama give the WASP's a collective, judicial slap in the face or not?

I've seen a picture of the new Supreme Court together, smiles, robes and all, and what do i see: a African American, a latino women, a couple catholics, a nice jewish girl and but one aged (soon to be retired) white haired WASP (the group which happens to have founded and built this nation and the Supreme Court's very existence). So now WASP's are, by far, the least repersented group on the Supreme Court and in danger of having no fellow WASP's on the bench, it's a warning sign of things to come people (that is a warning sign for WASP's and those who don't want to be governed over by a President Jesse Jackson in 23 years time).

I mean every other group (minus asians) gets to complain about "repsenation" what about us? And this is not just mindless racial nepotism it's in the WASP's self intrest and in our national intrest for the more Sotomayor's and the less WASP's that get on the Court usually means the more the Constuition will be torn to shrewds in the name of legalizing anti-white tyrannical "discrimination" law.

I end with a question. When the Court's lone WASP Judge Stevens leaves the Court (as he is exspected to do this year) there will be not one WASP on the Court as i've said. Not one reprsentative of the founding stock of this nation (and its almost sole inhabitants up until a few decades ago). The obvious question arises:

Will President Obama nominate a WASP to replace Stevens?

My humble guess is that Obama won't because the Media surely won't even discuss the matter of a potentially WASP-less Court at all and WASP's (who as a group seem to have somewhat lost there minds on acid in 1967) are to guilt-ridden to stand up for themselves anyways.

A rule for judging Supreme Court nomineess

After Sonia Sotomayor and Harriet Myers, the following should be very clear:

Whenever an adminstation's Supreme Court nominee is announced and people within that President's own party begin saying that there not qualified and not even that smart, take it as a sign they shouldn't have been nominated (and it's usually an indicator as in these two cases that they are a de facto affirmtive action nominee).

David Frum and many other couragious conservatives warned us that Bush nominee, Harriet Myers, was totally unqualified and Jeffrey Rosen and fewer liberals warned us (mostly when her name was floating around as a possibility) that Sonya Sotomayor would be unqualfied and not at the level of a Anton Scalia to say the least. If only the left had listened to Jeffrey Rosen when he warned them in the New Republic a latino activist (and memember of the racist LA RAZA) whose only desire as a judge is not to interpert the constuition but to advance her racial group's intrests and stick her finger in the eye of white as much as possible wouldn't now be sitting on the Supreme Court bench.