Is it racist?

Is it racist to not embrace full on the demographic transformation of your society, a transformation, furthermore, that will make your group go from a majority to an minority in a few decades and be divested of substanial political say (e.g. to be divested)? According to a huge amount of liberals the answer is yes but only if your white and you don't love going from a majority to a minority in your beloved England, France or America. However, liberals conclude, if your a black South African who doesn't want to become a minority thats just fine. Isn't racism treating people different on racial grounds?

Putting "Country First"?

This point comes approximately 1 year or 2 too late but who cares:

You shall remember that during the dreadful campaign of 2008, the lackluster Republican Nominee, John McCain's campiagn slogan was "Country First" below a military-esque star logo.



Over time the hypocritical absurdity and audacity of McCain making "Country First" his official campiagn slogan has only become more and more apparent. It's no mystery why he choose "Country First" because McCain wanted to play up the only issue his pollsters said he did well next to Obama on: national security.

"Country First" doesn't imply as much as says and promises and proclaims, at once, that John McCain is the kind of Presidential candiate who would never put his campaign ahead of his, ya' know......country.

The kind of politician that puts "Country First" is the kind candiate who wouldn't back a policy that was bad for the country just because they think it will, say, help them win a descive amount of votes among a certain voting bloc in the Arizona, er, i mean, nation's electorate. Like those white male Republican politicians from states with large latino populations like George W. Bush who back amnesty, a policy that is terrible for America in every way, because there political guru's tell them that if they do they can gain a extra slice of the latino vote that will prove descive in the upcoming election, kinda right? This reminds me, why did John McCain go to that Hispanic Caucus luncheon immediatly following the his defeat to Barak Obama and have a breakdown grabbing the microphone to accuse latinos of "betraying" him after all the "sacrifices" he made for them. What could McCain have meant by "sacrifices"? I mean, what did he do for hispanics that sacrificied his popularity with other (more patriotic-minded)? It's a real mystery.

And ya' know, John McCain was really putting politics second and "Country First" when he picked Sara Palin to be his running mate. Because, McCain decided to put stretagic political consideration to the side and just pick the most qualfied person in America for the job of VP when he choose Palin.
Sure, McCain could've picked some airhead who Republican pollsters and campiagn gurus like Karl Rove thought would poll we and help him out with a certain segment of the populations like women or hispanics but when it came time to pick a VP nominee John said,

"I do not care, do you understand me?, I repeat, I do not care if it's not good for our campaign I've got to pick the most qualified person for the job of Vice President, someone who knows the most about the world, whose read the great philosphers and historians, whose shown a profound understanding of the issues for years, some one with not just a brillant mind, there are lots of those, but the most brillant mind, someone who doesn't just know who Martin Van Buren's Secretary of State was but knows his whole biography let alone his name and thats why I've decided to pick Sarah Palin. I know that you guys are going to say that, 'she's too cerebreal! She's too intellectual! She'll never connect, let alone, relate with the common man!' or tell me that 'She's another Adlai Stevenson!'. But, look, I'll say it one time only: Sara Palin may not be the most attractive person that we could've picked, sure she doesn't exactly have sex appeal and sure she's a little plump and sure, theres more than a few wrinkles on her brow but shes got the most brillant mind of any politician in the United States. She may not prove to be the best for me poltically, but she's the best qualified for Vice President, for 2nd in command and I'm pointing country first!...For if, god forbid, I pass while in the White House, my friends, I want to know, I want to go to bed at night knowing, that I will have left for my beloved nations sake, not some airhead Republican who looks good but who hasn't a clue who Edmund Burke is but rather the most capable and equipt and eurdite American (available to me right now) in my place, as commander and chief of the United States of America. Lets face it my friends, I am well into my 7th decade and I still have cancer that at the moment lies dormant but at any time can return and put me 6 feet deep, when I picked VP, unlike Obama, I could very well be picking my succescor as President and thus I have a duty to place politics to the side and pick Sara Palin."

"YOU IDIOTS!"

1. Just a moment ago, liberal arrogance once again creeped into my life (despite my efforts. I saw the cover of the most recent Rolling Stone magazaine, which reads in big red letters "You Idiots!:the people who are getting in the way of climate change action".

It shows just how unintelligent these Gorite elements on the left are, that they don't even know that they are the ones making the audicious claims that people should be skeptical, at the very least, about.

2. One of the most ubiqitous ironies in contemporary American politics is the left's obbession with McCrathyism, which is, far and away, the most overblown so call "scandal" in American history. Thanks to the lefts lock on the neth-worlds of academia and media they have succeded in producing a mountain of films about McCrathyism and have produced US History textbooks which fail to mention Paul Reveere at all, Alexander Hamilton 3 times, John Marshall not at all but manage to mention the KKK 33 times and McCarthyism 39 times (and poltical correctness never). The irony is not the bias as much as the fact that the true McCarthists (if anybody is to be compared) of the last 40 years have been leftists not conservatives. I'd go as far as saying that the New McCarthyism of Potical Correctness is worse than McCarthyism itself. For one, McCarthyism last all but around half a decade. The imfamous "blacklists" aside, not that many innocent people (who weren't communists) where "ruined" by Joe McCarthy. You can't as many on one hand. The bulk of those who where negatively effected by McCarthy where often actually reds and they merely changed there pen names and continued to work in hollywood or they took a hiatus for a little and came back to Hollywood soon enough. McCarthy blowed over and he was a villian already by the 60's, his "victims" where accepted right back into hollywood or goverment and so on. And again there where not many victims despite the tens of thousands you would except there to be based on how many movies, plays and novels we've seen on McCarthyism. Poltical Correctness has hand probably over 200 percent more victims than McCarthyism and the victims have been victimized much more severely, losing jobs held for 50 years with noted brillance for the offence of innocently using the word un-racist "niggardly" in a document and other similiarly outrages intstances which unlike with McCarthyism can't be counted on a hand but would require a 700 page book to chronicle them all. Finally, unlike poltical correctness, McCarthyism, was mostly true in the sense that there where contrary to what most think, many communists and communists spies within the annals of the US goverment as the Alger Hiss case showed dating back to the 20's and 30's all the way up to the 50's. Poltical Correctness' claims of the boogeyman of white racism have, atleast, for the last 20 years been far far more sperious. And look McCarthyism only last half a decade at the end of which McCarthy was roundly discredited and denounced. Poltical Correctness reign of terror, if you will, has continued for roughly 4 decades and isn't discredited and diavowed by the mainstream at all, rather it is the mainstream (though it becomes less reveered with every passing day as its antics and claims of "racism" under every rock become ever-more clearly deseperate and slanderous. Here is one telling instance which reveals just how "tolerant" the left is and just how un-McCarthyite they are today. James D. Watson, our greatest living scienist, the man who discovered DNA in his 20's! He went on to found Cold Spring Harbour and teach at Harvard for 50 years. He gives a interview in London recently and says that we should lower our exspectations of Africa catching up to the West economically and so fourth considering that blacks have lower IQ's than Europeans (a fact). For mentioning that un-PC fact about IQ distrubution between the races Watson is dismissed as head of the labrotory he founded and built up from the ground for 50 years, Cold Spring Harbour and is roundedly diowned and shunned by academia and "respectable" PC society. Now who are the people smashing Galielo's telescopes?

Endless Dualities

Ever since the Obama era began i've been seeing doubles. Here's what I mean.

FIRST DUALITY

1. How does Obama treat mass murderer, KSM, the mastermind of 9-11

Obama acting against all precedents decides that Khalid Sheik Muhhomad (aka KSM) has Constuinial right even though he is not a citizen of the United States, leaving the side that he is the murderer of 3,000+ people, as the mastermind, the (confessed) mastermind, of 9/11. KSM admitted to what we know he did and pleaded to be executed.......like 5 years ago! And now, Obama and Eric Holder have decided to bring KSM to New York City for a civil civilian trial! not a military court!
Obama, showing such regard for our deficit, is bringing KSM to New York knowing that security alone for the trial will cost the US tax payer 200 million dollars, plus other innumerable costs. This means that KSM will be given millionaire liberal treasonist lawyers likely from ACLU to defend him and the litigation of the trial will extend, many legal anyalsts guess, a minumum of six years. In that time, the nation will watch ACLU treastonist lawyers argue (with the aid of all the former ACLU & SPLC & CAIR lawyers within Obama's new Justice Department) that all the evidence and confessions against KSM that where (even possibly) extracted by methods of "toture" (aka making KSM listen to Van Halen all day) must wiped from the record and rendered nhill. So, chances are, a good or great deal of the CIA's evidence against KSM will be rendered void. Who knows but i can't believe KSM won't be given the death penality. The embarsment will be that it will take 6 or 7 years and that at the end it will have cost the American people hundreds of millions of dollars when we should have hung KSM long ago. Obama will also make America look like a joke to extremists who will watch as pony-tailed CAIR & ACLU lawyers (who will probably be jews to blind to see that there client, KSM, would stab them in the heart with a ball point pen if he could) argue for there man, KSM on TV for 6 years! They'll watch as weak methods of forced interrogation will condemned and they will laugh at how weak and femnized America has become. 50,000 New Yorkers have signed a peition

2. How does Obama treat a American army solidier in Iraq

A navy seal accused of punching a Iraqi terrorist will be put on trial in Iraq, in a secret military tribunal so that we won't know what punishment he gets. So KSM, a non-citizen and a mass murderer who admitted to mastermining 9-11 and says he wants to die, gets full civil rights enshrined for citizens, a 6 year trial with millionaire dollar NYC lawyers but a Navy Seal who is accused of punching a terrorist in Iraq, doesn't get a civilian trial but a secret miltary tribunal that was made for people like KSM to be sentenced in secret.

DUALITY 2

1. Major Nadal Hasan jumps on a table at Fort Hood shouts "Alakuabar!" some islamic jihadist phrase and procedds to unload bullets, killing 16 off duty soldiers. We fine out that in power points as a pschritist he wrote about his love of jihad. His co-workers had reported years before his attachment to jihadism. We find out that the islamic phrase on his business card translated as "Warrior of Jihad". We find his emails back and fourth planning with a radical terrorist Imam in Yemen who later turns out to have helped trained the Nigerian crotch bomber. (there's even more information too). And Barak Obama comes on TV after the Hasan shooting and assures the country that the Fort Hood shooting had nothing to with Islam. Defense Secertary, Robert Gates, asked if he considered the Fort Hood Masscre a islamic terrorist attack, responds "im not even going to go there".

2. The New Haven Fire Deptarment gives out a test to promote firefighters to position of Capitian. Frank Ricci, who dyslexic and can barely read has spent 7 months studying hours a day for the test. He spends money to get friends to record a audiobook version of the relevant text book for the promotion test. He works and works on his off hours. The test for promotions to Captain comes, Ricci takes the test. He gets one of the highest scores of all, placing 6th among 70 plus test-takers meaning his promotion is automatic. But the city of New Haven, not liking the racial composition of those who got good enough scores for promotions, throws the test and Ricci doesn't get the promotion he earned. Ricci sues for discrimination since he obviously didn't get his job because he was white but would of had he simply been black. 6 other firefighters who passed the test, including one hispanic firefighter, file suit along with Ricci. There case, Ricci v. DeStefano makes all the way to the 2nd Apellate Court. The city of New Havens argues that the test was discrimitory towards black test takers even the test was checked not once but twice by companys which speciliazed in identifying if a test is "racially baised" or not. They don't even show how any one question on the test could have been discrimatory. One Judge on the 2nd Apellate Court is Judge Sonya Sotomayor, who votes against Frank Ricci and gives a astonishingly short ruling nearly just a paragraph long. Obama who agreed with Sotomayor that the black testtakers in New Haven had been discriminated against despite all the evidence, nominates Sotomayor to be his nominee for the Supreme Court. At this time, The Supreme Court overturns the decision in Ricci v. DeStefano in favor of Frank Ricci. During Sotomayors nomination hearings, Senator John Kyl asks Judge Sotomayor what precedent she followed in ruling against Ricci and fails to even give an answer.

So Obama and his people won't even call the masscacre at Fort Hood "islamic terrorism" but they will say that the New Haven fire fighters test that was checked twice for discrimination and which was approved to not be discriminatory both times was racist allow them can't show 1 discrimatory question on it.

DUALITY 3

1. Obama spend millions to increase black history month funding and AIDS education in stimulus bill.

2. Obama doesn't spend a dime on the broken border.

DUALITY 4

1. And here's another story that shows how transparent and open to the public the Obama Adminstration is being: remember that polling station in Philadephia that the Black Panthers took over in full military regalia with weapons such as night sticks, intimidating and yelling racial slurs at whites trying to vote, telling one white guy, "Your about to be ruled by the black man, cracker!"? Well, the Bush adminstration justice department had begun the prosectution of the black panthers involved but couldn't finish the prosecution before the Obama adminstration came in last Januarary. And guess what? Eric Holder, decided to hault and end the entire case against the Black Panthers.

2. This is while Holder sues Georgia for the "crime" of reuiring that those who want to vote verify citizenship with a ID. This is "discrimatory" according to Obama's Justice Department. Are blacks not allowed to get ID's in Georgia? No, they can like anyone else, but Holder claims that requiring voters to prove citizenship (a pretty basic procedure i thought) "disportionately effects African Americans and Latinos". So its illegal for Georgia require ID to vote because Holder claims blacks will not bring ID more than whites? huh? What if whites where effected more than blacks by Georgia's ID requirment? Would Holder sue Georgia then for "discrimination"? I don't think so. The truth is that Holder simply wants to ensure a high black turn out and illegal immigrant turn out so that he can keep his office in the Justice Department another term. But lets review, according to Barak Obama and the head of the Department of Justice, Eric Holder: its ok for a gang of black panthers to forcibly take over a Philadephia polling booth with weapons, to intimidate voters, yell racial slurs at white voters, but its "illegal" for the state of Georgia to have any requirments to make sure non-citizens are voting by requiring those who want to vote to prove citizenship. And i wonder would Holder have prosecuted that Philadephia case if the KKK had forcibly taken hold of a Philadephia voting station and intimidated and yell racial slurs at black voters? Something tells me Holder not only would have prosecuted that case but that we would still be hearing about for 20 years on NPR, ABC, MSNBC, with 5 year commerations of what happened. Justice indeed, huh?
Anyway, it gets even worse, even more hyprocritical and ridiclous. So after Holder squashed the case against the black panthers, some Republicans in the Senate where honorable enough to demand a exsplanation on behalh of the Justice Department for why they stopped the prosecution. But the Obama Justice Department refused to exsplain why it squashed the case, defying precedent even the Bush adminstation had never flouted.

Too bad only the readers of the Drudge Report, National Review, Vdare.com and a few other sites even know about these outrages. When will the mainstream media awake from its honeymoon with the Obama Adminstration (literally cause they are marrying each other) and start to be journalists again? Or is Rachel Maddow just going to spend each day calling Tea Partyers racists in a different sly way?

The young potheads that elected Barak Obama have no idea what there guy has been doing in office, they don't give a damn, there doing kegstands right now. And yet they are always getting appluaded by the Maureen Dowds. Yet the older patriotic Americans who care and know enough about whats going on to actually partcipate in Democracy by protesting and going to town-halls and speeches and rallys, they get scorned by the Mainstream Media, Maureen Dowd villifys them because there not "diverse" enough, because she doesn't like there skin color and there age.

Reform. Change. Transperency. Bah Humbug.

Gerald Ford: Not Who You Thought He Was

In reading Jeffrey Toobin's over-rated book on the Supreme Court, "The Nine" (which essentially argues that liberal judges are in the real tradition of the Founders), I was suprised to discover that Gerald Ford had come out as a vocal defender of Michigan Unviersity's system of massive racial preferences during the bro-ha-ha over Grutter v. Bollinger, the Michigan Unviersity Affirmtive Action case. But even more eyebrow raising was this quote from a New York Times Op-Ed former President Ford penned entitled, "Inclusive America: Under Attack",

"A pair of lawsuites would prohibit Michigan and other unviersitys from even considering race as one of many other factors weighed by admision counslers such a move would condemn future college students to suffer the cultural and social impoverishment that inflicted my generation"

Perhaps I was wrong to affix this kind of liberalism to only those under 65 years of age. Ford is dead ofcourse. I thought his generation, that of the WW2, was proud of themselves and there nation and there culture. I didn't know they scorned the wholesome, united social and cultural atomsphere of the 1940's as "cultural and social impoverishment" inflicting them? If only Gerald Ford had turned on a TV in the last 20 years of his life and seen what a rap video is he probably wouldn't have written such nonsence. So according to Ford, we should scorn and throw away the culture of the American army on D-Day in favor of the American culture of 2009 when the chart topping refrain on the radios of the nation is "Move Bitch, Get Out the Way!"? Hmm.
This is a phenmonon in Modern America. Those who have spent little to no time in a black ghetto, never seen a hip hop video, never gone to school with African Americans in signfigant numbers, and who have, overall, the least knowledge of black or latino ghetto culture are consitantly the very ones speaking about how they know that increased spread of latino & black ghetto culture is not just good but "essential" at any Unviersity and know that Michigan Univiersity student will sufferer tremendously in the absence of black and latino culture on their campus. These people who have spent the least time in the black or latino communitys and who have the least knowledge of either, have the highest opinion of both and claim for a fact that the academic underachievment, chronically high rates of violence, crime, illegitimacy and poverty among both latinos and blacks in America is the result of white racism & white oppression.
However, those white people who actually know black hip hop culture, who actually know blacks and latinos, go to school with them, work with them, live in the same neigborhoods, have a radically different more modest view of blacks and how much they "deserve" the racial preferences that Ford supports. Those whites that have the most exsperience with and knoweldge of black Americans have a much less grandiously positive view of the African American community compared to those whites like Gerald Ford who have virtually zero familiarity with the black community that Ford claims he was deprived of as a young man at Michigan Unviersity. Those whites who actually know and live with or around black culture do not complaim like Gerald Ford about the lack of it (especially at the places they send there children). They don't rejoice it the fact that there kids who go to the diverse schools Ford loves, schools that are 60 or 80 or 90 percent African American and latino. No, they want, more than anything, to send there kids to the least "diverse" schools possible, the whitest, most asian schools. They don't think there kids are suffering from any lack of black aka hip hop culture (which is the exact kind of "diversity" Ford is writing about whether he knows it or not). To the contrary, the parents of white children who have real knowledge of black (and latino hip hop) culture, who live in mostly minority neigborhoods, think there children are suffering from the presence of viscerally anti-academic black/hip hop culture, which Ford thinks Unviersitys must have as much as possible of.

Would blacks be better off had they never come into contact with Europeans/whites?

I'm not the only one to point out how little there is to say, in a certain away, about the Haiti quake. Well when i heard about the Haiti diaster and saw the amazing pictures of the Nation ruined infastructure, the first thing i thought about was Jermiah Wright, that brutish rogue. That demogauge is retired, living in his huge house in, of all places, a all white private community by the name of Beverly, Illinois. (He tells the poor south side blacks to hate whites sunday morning and rolls back to his all white community in his Benz, laughing the whole way.) I imagined that Rev. Wright was surely kicking back at his Beverly pad and watching the cable coverage of the Hiati quake=probably taking a brief break from writing the book Random House or some other publishing house has quitely paid him to write. And i thought what would Jermiah Wright be thinking as he reclined in his lay-z-boy and watched the destruction of the Hiatian countryside and saw white Americans handing out aid, food, operating on injured Haitians, etc. Wright has been saying for decades that blacks would be better just getting away from the sinister whites, how could he reconcile that with what we all saw in Haiti? His matra as a preacher was that "white people's greed keeps a world in a need", whites, in his estimation, where at the root of the genocide, disease, misery, poverty, violence, strife and famine that blighted the Third World. How does Rev. Wright and his many disciples of anti-white stylied black liberation theology sqaure there assertion that blacks are better off when whites aren't around to oppress and exsploit them with the fact that those African nations that have isolated themselves from the western world have only been worse off as a result?

In a way, Rev. Wright's beliefs about how whites have only held blacks down and that if white europeans had just steered clear of the motherland then Africans would be far better off today. This, of course, is a nice thing to believe. We want to believe that people are not ever constrained by biology and ofcourse that we are all equal. It would make sense as an exsplanation of the success and fanfare of Rev. Wright among South Side blacks that his popularity among his flock at Trinity Church of Christ is as someone who every Sunday tells pews full of black people that 1. black poverty and underachievment is not there fault but white's fault. Basically Wright, craft was to tell his congregation reassuring, comforting lies on a consitent basis and in a entertaining and fiery manner. From this angle, the modern black Sunday church exsperience is a excercise in communal self esteem boosting.

Of course though Rev. Wright is wrong/lying. Blacks have benefitted beyond imagination from contact, however coarse, with Europeans. This doesn't excuse slavery or brutality in Europe's African colonies, but, overall, Africa is far far better off today as a result of the Europe's time in Africa. Let's be honest here, however reductionist, the British and the Boers arrivived at the southern tip of a African contient that was still emmersed in the Stone Age-this at a time when Europe's had long passed the renassaince, the reformation, and where sailing around the earth, building castles and cannons while the Africans where largely living as primitive savages, half naked, living in mudhuts and hunting tigers with spears. The Boers where dressed in suites and top hats, with monocles and wool vests and bow ties. Take this instance from 1896, a group of Boers are trapped after there train breaks down in the middle of the Zulu nation. It didn't take very long for Zulu warriors, clad in little more than animal skin and leather covering there crotches, spotted these white Boers and charged towards the group of Boer families with spears in hand by the hundreds from almost every direction. The Boer's are doomed right? No, because those dutch/scottish/hugenot Boers had a new weapon with them a millenium beyond the techonolgy of the Zulu's spears. They had the Maxim gun, the first rapid fire machine gun, a product of us whites conniving, sinister minds. The Maxim Gun was helping the British conquering Africa from the North in the Sudan at the same time the Boers where doing the same in the south of the contitent. So, one of the boers brught out the Maxim Gun and with shocking ease gunned down the radius of charging Zulu warriors, there speed, agility and endurance meaning nothing in the face of the machine that the Teutonic mind has produced.
To put it tersely, Europeans came to a contient that was essentially a stone age jungle and left it with locomotives, railroads, hospitals, modern archeture, Unviersitys, water fountains, planes, cars, medicine, pencillen, polio vaccine, vaccines for thousands of other human plagues, and alot of other shit- no to mention all the trillions of dollars we, in the west, have given the African contient. Oh but you say, "what about all the Africans that the Europeans killed?" Untrue. The Europeans doubled the life exspectancy in decades in Africa?

Jail our protectors & free our harraserers

It is so shameful that the Obama adminstration is putting heroes in jail cells to rot for life & for what? For defending themselves on the front line when they are in the line of fire or for making a terrorist vermin stand up for 24 hours to get life saving info. Sickening. And yet the black panthers get to take over voting stations harrasing & threatening white voters with slurs & weapons & Obama kills the prosecution of them & won't exsplain why.